Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Opinion: Biden should ignore senator demands for COVID waiver


If the US president bows to demands and a COVID vaccine and treatments waiver is introduced at the WTO, patients will suffer in the long term

Two weeks ago, I went to the Bronx High School of Science to get my first COVID vaccine – Moderna's.

It was an exciting day, and not just because I was getting the vaccine. I felt like I was part of history. After all, getting this shot just over a year after the start of the pandemic, as have 40% of the US population (131 million people) as of publication, was nothing short of a miracle.

According to the Wellcome Trust, a charitable foundation focused on health research based in London, it usually takes around 10 years to develop a vaccine.

A COVID vaccine was probably always going to come quicker than that, given the severe health and economic imperatives it imposed on world governments. But even still, to get four vaccines (from Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer, AstraZeneca and Moderna) developed this quickly was amazing – even people in the biotech industry think so.

Related articles

The view of one intellectual property head from a major US pharma company, who I spoke to in January (not one of the vaccine makers), was that the pace of vaccine innovation was remarkable.

“I don’t think people have really grasped how monumental that achievement was,” he said. “At the outset of this, I would not have bet that we would have one vaccine by now, let alone four.

“It shouldn’t have worked – some of these vaccines are based on technology that has never worked for anything else. There should have been bigger side effects or the vaccines shouldn’t have been as good. But there weren’t, and they are,” he added. 

But this phenomenon won’t occur again if President Joe Biden and members of the World Trade Organization (WTO) bow to demands to introduce a waiver for intellectual property related to COVID vaccines and other treatments.

In October, the Indian and South African governments asked the WTO to waive certain provisions of the TRIPS Agreement to help prevent, contain and treat COVID.

That idea has since picked up steam – including among some of our reporters – and, as of late, groups of individuals have been asking the US president to support it.

Past world leaders and Nobel laureates, including former UK prime minister Gordon Brown and former Colombia president Juan Manuel Santos, sent Biden a letter last week urging him to support the South African-Indian proposal.

Among those who signed were 10 US senators, including former-presidential candidate and current senator for Vermont, Bernie Sanders.

Vaccine success

To waive these rights on vaccines and treatments now, however, would be to discourage such innovation in the future, should we end up in this situation again – and many experts think there’s a good chance of that happening, though not in the immediate future.

There were a few key drivers behind the staggering vaccine development pace over this past year, and most of them were facilitated by the IP that proponents of the waiver would like to see temporarily struck down.

Pharma companies that usually compete with one another came together in ways they never had before. They, along with world governments and research organisations, pumped enormous sums of money into research and development.

One of the few non-IP things that contributed to the speed of COVID vaccines and other treatments was how hard the researchers worked behind the scenes – which, I feel compelled to say, as someone who is good friends with one of the scientists at the University of Oxford.

As Novartis IP pharma head Galit Gonen pointed out in a recent op-ed, IP enables biotech collaborations such as the ones that made these vaccines possible by allowing different originators and universities to come together in complex cross-licensing deals or other variable arrangements.

More importantly, patents and the monopolies they provide give pharma companies huge incentives to develop vaccines quickly in situations like the one we’ve been in – mainly, exclusive access to guaranteed markets of billions of people that facilitate appropriate return on investment.

For that reason alone, Biden shouldn’t support a COVID IP waiver, and neither should the members of the WTO.

Why would these companies – which, like it or not, are corporate entities with commercial interests – produce treatments at such speed again knowing that these incentives could be pulled away at any moment?

The other side

I’m not unsympathetic towards the pleas of the Indian and South African governments. There is undoubtedly a disparity in the vaccine roll-out between richer and poorer countries. And in principle, who wouldn’t be in favour of getting vaccines to as many people as possible as quickly as possible?

In my own family, my 78-year-old father who lives in Portugal hasn’t had a vaccine. Because I live in the US, I’ll probably have both my shots before he has even had one. And he will likely have had both before someone his age in South Africa has even had one.

After all, the African continent contains just over 17% of the global population, and had received just 1.5% of vaccinations as of mid-March. It’s deeply unfair.

But none of us would have any vaccines at all, or at least not for several more years, had the proper IP incentives not been in place. Waiving IP at this stage sets a dangerous precedent that could lead to exactly that situation in the future, one where patients across the world suffer more in the long term.

There’s also the point that there’s little evidence that waiving IP would help scale up the vaccination effort anyway.

Guilherme Cintra, director of innovation policy at the International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers & Associations, pointed out last year that the funds needed to scale up vaccine manufacturing facilities would still be lacking if all IP on COVID treatments disappeared.

He noted that the transfer of know-how that would help ensure full compliance with strict regulatory standards would also be challenging.

With that in mind, then, the risk of a COVID IP waiver – where no one anywhere in the world would be able to get excited for a dose of health or sense of historical significance – clearly outweighs the reward, which could well be nothing.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The Supreme Court, which is hearing two IP cases this week, should limit the power of US courts to rule on foreign sales
Safety standards wouldn’t lose copyright protection when named in law, so long as they were accessible for free online
In-house tech sources say Amgen v Sanofi has the potential to stifle their prosecution and litigation strategies if SCOTUS’s decision is too broad
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis coverage from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
The Federal Circuit said tech firms can challenge the way the USPTO implemented Fintiv, but that won’t mean much for practitioners, say counsel
The England and Wales High Court handed down one of the most hotly anticipated FRAND rulings for some time
Funders discuss different IP portfolio funding options and how they decide whether to offer preferential terms and pricing
The issue of the Unified Patent Court’s third central division needs resolving before IP owners can fully embrace Europe’s new era
Foreign firms and lawyers, including IP practitioners, can now practise in India after years of talk and no action
Most Indian counsel won’t immediately look beyond the Delhi High Court for IP cases, but new forums could potentially change their minds