Naming rights: a two-way synergy

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Naming rights: a two-way synergy

Sponsored by

daniel-400px.png
ivars-utinans-8bqilrds7ak-unsplash.jpg

Carolina Schueler of Daniel Law discusses why naming rights and sponsorship deals could be a profitable two-way partnership that may last for decades

Allianz Arena in Munich, Nissan Stadium in Yokohama, Neo Química Arena in São Paulo, Vodafone Park in Istanbul, and American Airlines Theatre in New York City. What do these iconic venues have in common besides gathering a lively and excited audience?

Like hundreds of other stadiums, arenas, office towers, theatres and concert halls around the globe, these venues are sponsored by corporations that acquire the rights to name them.

The naming rights strategy was first introduced in the US in 1926, when the American  chewing gum company Wrigley named the Chicago Cubs Stadium as the Wrigley Field – the stadium still carries the name up until now. In 1972, the Rich Products Corporation signed the first naming right formal agreement: a 25-year deal for the Buffalo Bills' new stadium, which then became the Rich Stadium. This was just the beginning of a new advertising practice.

Globally, naming rights contracts have substantially increased in popularity since the 1980s. As many stadiums or arenas now host multi-sport competitions and often serve as a stage for concerts, venue-naming rights can present an excellent opportunity to expose brand names to a diverse customer base.

In terms of cost effectiveness, a brand’s addressable market can be accessed without the regular and high running costs that advertising boards on single concerts, matches or multimillion-dollar prime time slots require.

In Brazil, the most recent deal in sports puts a spotlight on Hypera Pharma, the country’s largest pharmaceutical company. In an agreement of $55.6 million, Hypera acquired the naming rights of Arena Corinthians, now called Neo Química Arena – one of the company’s most valuable brands. The 20-year deal also covers hosting rights for concerts and non-soccer events.

The benefits of the naming rights go far beyond their long-term exposure in total exclusivity to the public: corporations and brands become more easily associated with their engagement to environmental, educational, and cultural development.

Another category of partnership that companies explore to gain media exposure is the Title Sponsorship. Usually focused on events, expositions, programmes, this is a more targeted investment for companies, such as the Turkish Airlines EuroLeague, the Formula 1 Rolex Australian Grand Prix, and the Brazilian Petrobras Symphony Orchestra.    

Nuestro Sound presented by Target, Rio Open presented by Claro and NAPA Auto Parts 200 presented by Dodge are a few examples of events that carry the sponsor name or brand in their titles. In this particular contract, the name of the event remains unchanged, but sponsors acquire the rights – that might be exclusive or not – in a prominent spot alongside the event name.

Naming rights and sponsorship deals may be delivered in a variety of formats to bring benefits for both sides. Through positive brand associations, injection of capital and broadened customer awareness, these strategies create desirable synergies – a profitable two-way partnership that may last for decades.

Carolina Schueler

Partner, Daniel Law

E: carolina.schueler@daniel-ip.com


 

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Brian Paul Gearing brings technical depth, litigation expertise, and experience with Japanese business culture to Pillsbury’s IP practice
News of InterDigital suing Amazon in the US and CMS IndusLaw challenging Indian rules on foreign firms were also among the top talking points
IP lawyers at three firms reflect on how courts across Australia have reacted to AI use in litigation, and explain why they support measured use of the technology
AJ Park’s owner, IPH, announced earlier this week that Steve Mitchell will take the reins of the New Zealand-based firm in January
Chris Adamson and Milli Bouri of Adamson & Partners join us to discuss IP market trends and what law firm and in-house clients are looking for
Noemi Parrotta, chair of the European subcommittee within INTA's International Amicus Committee, explains why the General Court’s decision in the Iceland case could make it impossible to protect country names as trademarks
Inès Garlantezec, who became principal of the firm’s Luxembourg office earlier this year, discusses what's been keeping her busy, including settling a long-running case
In the sixth episode of a podcast series celebrating the tenth anniversary of IP Inclusive, we discuss IP Futures, a network for early-career stage IP professionals
Rachel Cohen has reunited with her former colleagues to strengthen Weil’s IP litigation and strategy work
McKool Smith’s Jennifer Truelove explains how a joint effort between her firm and Irell & Manella secured a win for their client against Samsung
Gift this article