How can domain name owners protect themselves from scammers?
Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX
Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

How can domain name owners protect themselves from scammers?

Color cubes in the sphere shape domain names

.inc’s webinar and whitepaper on brand safety provides information on the types of threats scammers pose and what businesses can do to mitigate risks to their domain names

.inc’s recent webinar and whitepaper on brand safety dealt with the protection of domain names in a world where scamming is rife, operates under multiple guises and has the capacity to wreak havoc on a business. The webinar, Treating Digital Truth Decay, featured a conversation between Ruminul Islam, a brand protection analyst at Safenames and Jamie Nafziger, a partner at law firm Dorsey & Whitney. Jamie Nafziger also authored the whitepaper, entitled Deepfakes, Fake News and Viral Hoaxes. Both the webinar and whitepaper cover similar issues, the most salient of which are detailed below.

What types of threats exist?

Domain names can fall prey to a number of different scams, including phishing and typosquatting. Nafziger honed in on the latter in her webinar, explaining that typosquatting involves making a very subtle change to a domain name (such as replacing one letter) in order to make people believe that they are communicating with its real owner. She also mentioned dropcatching. When a company lets a domain name expire, squatters can step in and acquire it. They can then attempt to extort money from the original owner of the name, refusing to return it, unless they are paid thousands. Alternatively they can use it to redirect traffic to a site of their own choosing.

These are just some of the threats that exist.

What are the consequences of being scammed?

There are many consequences of being scammed, some of which are a loss to reputation, financial loss and the risk of tax fraud. In addition, a business must bear the legal cost of pursuing the scammer.

What can companies do to avoid being scammed?


There are a number of actions companies can take to avoid scammers hijacking their domain names.

Firstly, Nafziger advocates choosing a memorable and distinctive brand name. This helps users of the domain name to identify it in a sea of other brands. Nafziger writes in her whitepaper, “strong brands are usually coined terms that are easy to spell or are existing words used in unexpected ways.” A weak brand name attracts scammers, who, with small tweaks, can stealthily change the domain name and redirect traffic to their sites.

Nafziger is in favour of short domain names. We have become accustomed to a world of truncated communication; emojis are used to convey feelings and thoughts, and abbreviations are routinely utilised in online communication. In-keeping with the linguistic tendencies of the virtual world, Nafziger proposes using names without hyphens and numbers. This, she asserts, will mitigate the risk of typosquatting. In her whitepaper she writes, “to get a short domain name, consider registering in one of the new generic top-level domain (gTLD) names, which have greater availability than .com.” Frequently the brand name followed by .com is already in operation, while the brand name coupled with .inc will not be taken. She recommends carrying out careful checks on the registry in order to assess its reputation and ascertain what protection it provides.

Nafziger also advises companies to register defensively. Businesses should think of different variants and misspellings of a domain name and register these. They should also register in other domain name extensions. Scammers routinely use homographs to create fraudulent domain names. Homographs are words that are mostly in Roman alphabet but include, for example, two Cyrillic characters. They are difficult to detect and can therefore be put to effective use by scammers. It is advisable to register or block homographs.

Nafziger suggests auto-renewing domain names to avoid loss of business and dropcatching. She also recommends locking domain names: “Protect the domain names you have from unauthorised transfers by using registrar lock services and registry lock services if they are available.” She recommends immediate action if infringement occurs.

At the end of her whitepaper, Nafziger mentions ICANN’s next round of domain name expansion and the potential for brands to register a .brand gTLD.

If you would like to listen to the webinar and download the whitepaper, please click here.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Lawyers reveal how they inform clients about the IP implications of fast-moving private equity deals
View the Social Impact EMEA Awards 2024 shortlist and join us on September 12 at The Waldorf Hotel in London
James Tumbridge talks about advising the government on AI and why his day could start with the police and end with legal networking
Data from Managing IP+’s Talent Tracker shows that the IP ambitions of Asian full-service firms and a life sciences focus in the US have prompted lateral moves
Michelle Lue-Reid has joined the IP business as its chief transformation officer and will look to implement major change initiatives across member firms
Chad Landmon, who joins in Washington DC, hopes to expand the firm’s Hatch-Waxman practice
The FRAND rate is only 5 cents higher than the per-device rate determined at first instance in 2023
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Nearly four months after joining Crowell & Moring, Edward Taelman reflects on starting afresh, new clients, and firm culture
Firms discuss the ebb and flow of life sciences IP work and explain how they help professionals pivot between specialities
Gift this article