Landscape analysis of 5G patent families
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Landscape analysis of 5G patent families

5g-min.jpeg

Yuji Orita and Toshihiro Nakane of NGB IP Research Institute examine who is leading the 5G patent race and in which countries it is being run

Figure 1 shows the cumulative number of 5G patent families from January 2017 to September 2020. The blue area shows declared 5G patent families by declaration month. The red line shows granted 5G patent families that have at least one granted patent as of October 5 2020. Some of the patent applications in the declared 5G patent families become granted patents over time. In each dot in the red line, we determined whether the declared 5G patent families in each declaration month have at least one granted patent as of October 5 2020, rather than as of each declaration month.

The substantial rise in declared 5G patent families started from around December 2017, and the number has grown continuously since then. This is mainly because the initial launch of 3GPP Release-15, which is a major release with respect to 5G technology, was frozen around Q4 2017 to Q1 2018. It was the first 3GPP release containing the full set of 5G standards. While initial specifications enabled non-standalone 5G radio systems to be integrated in previous-generation LTE networks, the scope of Release 15 expands to cover 'standalone' 5G, with a new radio system complemented by a next-generation core network. Features of 3GPP Release-15 include new radio, 5G system phase 1, massive machine-type communications and internet of things, vehicle-to-everything communications (V2X) phase 2, mission critical interworking with legacy systems, WLAN and unlicensed spectrum use, and slicing-logical end-to-end networks.

Figure 1: Cumulative number of declared 5G patent families counted by declaration month

As of October 5, 2020, Source: IPlytics platform

fig1-ngb.jpg

Figure 2 shows the top 15 companies by the number of declared 5G patent families (see column A), and the proportion of each company's patent families based on the total number of the declared 5G patent families (see column B). We integrated Nokia's data with that of its subsidiary Alcatel-Lucent.

We used the same order of the top 15 companies in Figure 2 when generating Figures 3, 5 and 6, respectively.

As Figure 2 shows, as of October 5 2020 the total number of declared 5G patent families was 35,392. Huawei (6,372 patent families) is in first place and accounts for 18% of the total. Other companies with more than 4,000 declared 5G patent families are Qualcomm (4,590, 13%) and Samsung (4,052, 11.4%). Comparing the data with NGB's data analysis as of May 17 2020, there was a noticeable increase (by 20%) in the total number of declared 5G patent families over the last five months (29,586 to 35,392). Huawei's growth rate is 7%, Qualcomm's is 67%, and Samsung's is 19%. Qualcomm has increased its number significantly, overtaking Samsung for second place. Along with these top companies, Sharp (growth rate: 79%), Catt (growth rate: 32%) and Vivo (growth rate: 51%) also show a significant growth. Xiaomi (462 patent families, 1.3%) has been a newcomer to the rankings in the last five months.

Figure 2: Number of declared 5G patent families by company

As of October 5, 2020, Source: IPlytics platform

Declaring company name

A

Number of declared 5G patent families*

B

Proportion of declared 5G patent families*

A / Total (35,392) [%]

Huawei Technologies

6,372

18.0%

Qualcomm

4,590

13.00%

Samsung Electronics

4,052

11.40%

Nokia Group

2,690

7.60%

LG Electronics

2,666

7.50%

ZTE

2,665

7.50%

Ericsson

1,838

5.20%

Sharp

1,539

4.30%

Catt

1,465

4.10%

NTT Docomo

1,019

2.90%

Intel

998

2.80%

Guangdong Oppo Mobile Telecommunications

986

2.80%

Vivo Mobile Communications

616

1.70%

InterDigital

607

1.70%

Xiaomi

462

1.30%

Others

2,827

8.00%

Total

35,392

100.00%

* Both granted patent families and non-granted patent families

Figure 3 shows, for the top 15 companies, the number of granted 5G patent families (see column C) and the proportion of each company's granted 5G patent families based on the total number of granted families (see column D).

While Huawei (2,993) is still first in the ranking, Samsung (2,628) in second place closes the gap with Huawei compared with the situation in Figure 2 (Huawei: 6,372 patent families; Samsung: 4,052). Compared with Figure 2, Figure 3 shows that Huawei's proportion has decreased by 0.6 points and Samsung's has increased by 3.9 points. ZTE, Catt, Intel, Oppo, Vivo and Xiaomi have a smaller proportion of granted 5G patent families when compared with Figure 2. It is likely that these companies have more families with an application under examination.

Figure 3: Number of granted 5G patent families by company

As of October 5, 2020, Source: IPlytics platform

Declaring company name

C

Number of granted 5G patent families*

D

Proportion of granted 5G patent families*

C / Total (17,179) [%]

Huawei Technologies

2,993

17.4%

Qualcomm

2,323

13.50%

Samsung Electronics

2,628

15.30%

Nokia Group

1,963

11.40%

LG Electronics

1,663

9.70%

ZTE

555

3.20%

Ericsson

948

5.50%

Sharp

967

5.60%

Catt

283

1.60%

NTT Docomo

460

2.70%

Intel

200

1.20%

Guangdong Oppo Mobile Telecommunications

83

0.50%

Vivo Mobile Communications

34

0.20%

InterDigital

386

2.20%

Xiaomi

61

0.40%

Others

1,632

9.50%

Total

17,179

100.00%

* including at least one granted patent

Figure 4 shows the distribution of the priority years of the declared 5G patent families. We can see an increasing trend of declared 5G patent families having priority from the year 2012 to 2017. This is mainly because the initial launch of 3GPP Release-15 was frozen around Q4 2017 to Q1 2018. Usually, companies try to file a patent well before a standard is frozen so that they can declare their patents (granted or applications) as essential to that standard. Sometimes, they can also influence a particular feature to be included in the standard mainly because they already had a relevant granted patent.

Figure 4: Priority years of declared 5G patent families

As of October 5, 2020, Source: IPlytics platform

fig4-ngb.jpg

Figure 5: Countries of declared 5G patent families

As of October 5, 2020, Source: IPlytics platform

Declaring company name

Published country of declared 5G patent families*

US

EP

JP

CN

KR

Total**

Huawei Technologies

3,921

3406

1,134

5,833

921

6,372

Qualcomm

4,495

2856

1,991

3,075

2,058

4,590

Samsung Electronics

3,626

2062

956

2,109

3,268

4,052

Nokia Group

2,279

2152

870

1,503

772

2,690

LG Electronics

2,151

1132

720

1,096

1,730

2,666

ZTE

544

490

228

2,660

142

2,665

Ericsson

1,272

1185

493

922

320

1,838

Sharp

1,228

827

1,259

999

70

1,539

Catt

118

122

35

1,421

60

1,465

NTT Docomo

609

595

978

608

194

1,019

Intel

883

186

128

293

144

998

Guangdong Oppo Mobile Telecommunications

236

291

136

950

233

986

Vivo Mobile Communications

13

14

616

616

InterDigital

564

395

339

387

331

607

Xiaomi

135

92

15

457

28

462

Total***

24,313

17,364

10,251

24,831

11,303

35,392

*: both granted patent families and non-granted patent families
**: the number of declared 5G patent families per company
***: the total number not just from the top 15 companies but from others too

Figure 5 (see above) shows the distribution of the countries of the declared 5G patent families. China and the US are the most popular countries/jurisdictions of declared 5G patent families, followed by the EPO. Further, China reportedly has the most number of active 5G users: 110 million. According to Figure 5, Huawei has the highest number of declared 5G patent families in China and at the EPO; Qualcomm has the most in the US and Japan, and has a large number outside of its home country (which is the US). On the other hand, ZTE (China), Catt (China), Intel (US), Oppo (China), Vivo (China), InterDigital (US) and Xiaomi (China) have a large bias towards declared 5G patent families in their home countries.

Figure 6 shows the distribution of the technical specification groups (TSGs) of the declared 5G patent families. The three main TSGs are radio access network (RAN), services/systems aspects (SA), and core network and terminals (CT). RAN defines radio communications between user equipment (UE) and the core network. SA is responsible for overall architecture and service capabilities. CT is responsible for the core network. All of the top 15 companies declare more 5G patent families in RAN compared with SA and CT. This is because the majority of the enhancements of 5G technology lie within the radio access part of the network. Huawei and Nokia have a larger number of patent families in SA and CT than the other 15 companies, and it is expected that they are also actively working on standardisation in these areas.

Figure 6: Technical specification groups of declared 5G patent families

As of October 5, 2020, Source: IPlytics platform

Declaring company name

Number of declared 5G patent families*

RAN

SA

CT

Total**

Huawei Technologies

4,934

1,338

275

6,372

Qualcomm

4,085

522

182

4,590

Samsung Electronics

3,706

488

143

4,052

Nokia Group

1,653

884

397

2,690

LG Electronics

2,533

79

80

2,666

ZTE

2,419

185

145

2,665

Ericsson

1,614

183

127

1,838

Sharp

1,409

88

86

1,539

Catt

1,312

132

13

1,465

NTT Docomo

986

28

46

1,019

Intel

947

68

59

998

Guangdong Oppo Mobile Telecommunications

965

30

6

986

Vivo Mobile Communications

598

12

13

616

InterDigital

492

123

89

607

Xiaomi

461

1

4

462

Total***

30,236

4,669

2,069

35,392

*: both granted patent families and non-granted patent families
**: the number of declared 5G patent families per company
***: the total number not just from the top 15 companies but from others too

Takeaways

What we have learned from this analysis:

1) Huawei is in the leading position in the number of declared 5G patent families, followed by Qualcomm and Samsung, and Huawei has the largest number of declared 5G patent families in China and at the EPO.

2) There was a noticeable increase (by 20%) in the total number of declared 5G patent families from May to October.

3) China and the US are the most popular countries/jurisdictions of declared 5G patent families, followed by the EPO.

4) All of the top 15 companies declared maximum number of 5G patent families in RAN compared with SA and CT.

We hope that this report helps many stakeholders in 5G technology to have more practical discussions and make better determinations.

Yuji Orita is general manger, and Toshihiro Nakane group leader, at NGB IP Research Institute in Tokyo.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

EMEA research now open
Practitioners analyse a survey on how law firms prove value to their clients and reflect on why the concept can be hard to pin down
The winner of Managing IP’s Life Achievement Award discusses 50 years in IP law and how even he can’t avoid imposter syndrome
Saya Choudhary of Singh & Singh explains how her team navigated nine years of litigation to secure record damages of $29 million and the lessons learned along the way
The full list of finalists has been revealed and the winners will be presented on June 20 at the Metropolitan Club in New York
A team of IP and media law specialists has joined from SKW Schwarz alongside a former counsel at Sky
The Irish government has delayed a planned referendum on whether Ireland should join the Unified Patent Court, prompting concern about when a vote may take place
With more than 250 winners recognised during the ceremony, there are many reasons to be positive about the health of the IP industry in EMEA
Practitioners say the USPTO’s latest guidance has some helpful clarifications and is a good reminder of the importance of checking AI outputs
Susanne Schmidt discusses why trademarks are more than 'just a name' and why she would choose green farming as an alternative career
Gift this article