US: TTAB prohibits registration of mark with US flag design
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

US: TTAB prohibits registration of mark with US flag design

smoke flag of United States

In In re Alabama Tourism Department, the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) issued an uncommon refusal to register under Section 2(b) of the Lanham Act the mark shown below owned by the Alabama Tourism Department (ATD), on the ground that the mark includes a simulation of the United States flag. In doing so, the TTAB sent a reminder that the benefits of federal registration may not be available to marks incorporating flag designs.

us-image-summer20.jpg

A Section 2(b) analysis requires the TTAB to consider a number of factors. Section 2(b) of the Trademark Act prohibits registration of a mark that "[c]onsists of or comprises the flag or coat of arms or other insignia of the United States, or of any State or municipality, or of any foreign nation, or any simulation thereof." Refusal is appropriate if the design would be perceived by the public as a flag, regardless of whether other matter appears with or on the flag. On the other hand, the presence of some flag elements in a mark does not necessarily warrant refusal, and flags displayed in a stylised, incomplete or unique form may be eligible for registration.

Accordingly, to determine whether the ATD's mark could be registered, the TTAB examined whether: (i) the flag design would be perceived as a simulation of an actual US flag; (ii) the elements of the flag create a distinct commercial impression other than as the US flag; (iii) significant features of the US flag are missing or changed; (iv) the flag design is used to form a letter, number, or design; (v) the flag design is substantially obscured by words or designs; and (vi) the flag design is not in a shape normally seen in the US flag.

ATD, for its part, contended that the flag design in its mark was missing significant features of the US flag, formed another design, was substantially obscured by other designs in the mark and was not in a shape normally seen in the US flag, adding that the registration of other marks involving elements of the American flag justifies registration of its mark. However, the TTAB was not convinced.

After assessing and rejecting each of ATD's arguments, the TTAB affirmed the refusal to register, concluding that the flag "design shown in the proposed mark is not sufficiently altered, stylized, or merged with the other elements in the mark, so as to create a distinct commercial impression, other than as a simulation of the [US] flag," and noting that their decision was not inconsistent with the registration of the third-party marks cited by ATD.

Karen Artz Ash and Jerry Jakubovic

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

External counsel for automotive companies explain how trends such as AI and vehicle connectivity are affecting their practices and reveal what their clients are prioritising
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis coverage from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
The winners of the awards will be revealed at a gala dinner in New York City on April 25
Counsel debate the potential outcome of SCOTUS’s latest copyright case after justices questioned whether they should dismiss it
Each week Managing IP speaks to a different IP lawyer about their life and career
The small Düsseldorf firm is making a big impact in the UPC. Founding partner Christof Augenstein explains why
The court criticised Oppo’s attempts to delay proceedings and imposed a penalty, adding that the Chinese company may need to pay more if the trial isn’t concluded this year
Miguel Hernandez explains how he secured victory for baby care company Naterra in his first oral argument before the Federal Circuit
The UPC judges are wrong – restricting access to court documents, and making parties appoint a lawyer only to have a chance of seeing them, is madness
The group, which includes the Volkswagen, Seat and Audi brands, is now licensed to use SEPs owned by more than 60 patent owners
Gift this article