Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Philippines: What is the effect of the modified ECQ?

Sponsored by

Global virus and disease spread, coronavirus

The city of Manila was placed under Enhanced Community Quarantine (ECQ) on March 16 2020 and all government offices and private businesses except those providing essential services, were required to work from home or closed. Public transportation was suspended, and everyone was required to practise social distancing and wear face masks.

On May 16 2020, the government relaxed the ECQ and put Manila under modified ECQ (MECQ). Within this framework, government offices and selected private businesses were allowed to work at 50% capacity, but still required to wear face masks and carry out social distancing. Restaurants, movie theatres, beauty salons etc. are still prohibited from opening, public transportation still not available, and mass gatherings still prohibited.

The Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines (IPOPHL) is on a skeleton workforce at 40% of its manpower, and work from home arrangements remain in place until May 31 2020. Memorandum Circular No. 2020-13 and 2020-13A issued on May 15 2020 has the following salient points:

1) New and renewal trademark applications shall only be filed through the IPOPHL's electronic filing system. Documents related to registered marks as well as pending applications shall only be transmitted through eDocfile.

2) Except for applications which exceed 250 pages, new applications for patents, design and utility models shall only be filed through the electronic filing system of the IPOPHL.

3) Scanned copies of original documents shall be submitted through the online filing system, but parties may be required to submit original documents on questions involving authenticity or due execution.

4) Other IPOPHL bureaus and offices without existing online filing systems shall continue to accept manual filings, and filings via post or private courier.

5) Deadlines for payments and submission of papers, replies and other documents due for filing between March 16 2020 and April 30 2020 have been extended to June 30 2020 and those with deadlines between April 1 and April 30 2020 are extended to July 30 2020.

6) Expecting voluminous filings when it opens on May 27 2020 and to comply with the social distancing protocol and avoid long queues, the IPOPHL has mandated the cashiering and receiving sections to accept filings by alphabetical order, e.g. law firms, agents with names beginning with the first letters A-C are scheduled for May 27 2020.

7) Hearings and mediation conferences remain suspended until May 22 2020, unless a request for an online hearing or conference is made.

The IPOPHL is maximising the use of its online filing system as stated above. On March 19 2020, the use of eDocfile for patents was launched. The transactions covered are: (i) responses (ii) basic annuity payment, extensions, recordals; (iii) requests for correction; (iv) requests for certified copies; (v) requests for registrability reports; (vi) submissions of POA; (vii) revivals, renewals for industrial designs; (viii) voluntary amendments, follow-up letters, and other patent related documents; (ix) report for utility models and industrial designs.

The guidelines for online mediation have been circulated for comments, and this is expected to be implemented by June 2020. Should the Covid-19 situation improve, Manila could move to the next level which is the General ECQ, where public transportation would be made available and more businesses opened, but still with the wearing of face masks and social distancing.

Editha Hechanova

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis coverage from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Sukanya Sarkar shares her thoughts on this year’s annual meeting in Singapore, where debates ranged from AI opportunities to improving law firm culture
The court’s ruling is a good reminder that US parties aren’t guaranteed attorney fees just because they win, say sources
With business confidence in a shaky state, Rachel Tong and Lisa Yong of Rouse discuss how in-house IP teams can manage their trademark portfolios through uncertain times
The Court of Appeal had stern words for Med-El’s representatives after they highlighted a deputy judge’s background as a solicitor
Funders and NPEs say asserting patent portfolios can minimise risk at the USPTO’s PTAB, where procedure remains a controversial topic
The US Supreme Court’s ruling wasn’t a surprise and reflects a trend that had already been bubbling away for a while, say tech and pharma counsel
Previous attempts at major transatlantic tie-ups have failed, so lawyers will keep their eyes firmly on Allen & Overy’s grand plans
INTA CEO Etienne Sanz de Acedo shares his plans if he were to win the EUIPO leadership race and says his application does not affect his INTA role
The French finance minister told António Campinos the timing of an EPO event in Lisbon could be seen as interference in the EUIPO leadership race