Mexico: Fighting counterfeits during COVID-19
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Mexico: Fighting counterfeits during COVID-19

Sponsored by

definition of counterfeits

Unfortunately, Mexico remains on the Watch List of the Annual Special 301 Report on Intellectual Property Protection and Review of Notorious Markets for Counterfeiting and Piracy compiled by the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR). In this document, the United States government reviews and evaluates the protection actions that governments have taken to fight against counterfeits and piracy. The document concluded that the Mexican government has so far not adequately implemented the necessary actions for the protection of intellectual property rights.

In accordance with the foregoing, the Mexican government should implement measures in order to strengthen actions against piracy and counterfeiting. However, the situation arising from the COVID-19 pandemic has changed the whole panorama of our country. Proof of this is that, as a result of the health security measures that have been implemented in Mexico to prevent the spread of COVID-19, the competent authorities have suspended their work. Actions such as inspections, seizures, investigations, admission of infringements actions, etc. have been suspended.

We must bear in mind that there has been an increase in counterfeits and piracy worldwide mainly due to the implementation of e-commerce.

According to data from the Research, Consumption and Telecommunications department of the International Data Corporation (IDC), e-commerce is expected to increase by 60% in Mexico at the end of 2020. As a result, our country will need to implement adequate legal measures for the protection of IP rights in the digital environment, hand-in-hand with seizure of products once they are imported.

Despite the above, intentions have been demonstrated by the federal government to continue the fight against piracy and counterfeits. The best example is that recently the Mexican Institute of Industrial Property (IMPI) referenced the possibility of introducing measures in order to obtain seizure at customs by the IMPI. This will mean cooperation between Mexican customs and the Mexican Institute of Industrial Property so that right holders can initiate actions to stop violations and infringements of their IP rights. It is an important bit of progress to highlight, since this is the only procedure that has been initiated by the IMPI on litigation matters during the pandemic.

The Attorney General's Office continues with its work carrying out mainly seizures of counterfeit products in customs, due to the possible commission of crimes. However, raids initiated due to the violation of IP rights have been stopped due to public health issues.

As a result, we must be clear about the need to implement new, effective and adequate ways to fight against piracy/counterfeits, such as the possibility of executing online actions in order to carry out "takedowns" of websites and social media that offer illegal products, auctions sites, along with efficient and early detection and implementation for the seizure of illegal products.

Without a doubt, Mexico has an unbeatable opportunity to renew our systems of protection for IP rights. The country depends on the intention of all rights holders, the federal authorities and society itself, to improve our reality after this pandemic. We must take advantage of this crisis to improve as a society and generate a better future for all.

Fernanda Díaz

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Counsel reveal how a proposal to create separate briefings for discretionary denials at the USPTO could affect their PTAB strategies
The UK Supreme Court rejected the firm’s appeal against an earlier ruling because it did not raise an arguable point of law
Loes van den Winkel, attorney at Arnold & Siedsma, explains why clients' enthusiasm is contagious and why her job does not mean managing fashion models
Allen & Gledhill partner Jia Yi Toh shares her experience of representing the winning team in the first-ever case filed under Singapore’s new fast-track IP dispute resolution system
In-house lawyers reveal how they balance cost, quality, and other criteria to get the most from their relationships with external counsel
Dario Pietrantonio of Robic discusses growth opportunities for the firm and shares insights from his journey to managing director
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Law firms that pay close attention to their client relationships are more likely to win repeat work, according to a survey of nearly 29,000 in-house counsel
The EMEA research period is open until May 31
Practitioners analyse a survey on how law firms prove value to their clients and reflect on why the concept can be hard to pin down
Gift this article