Survey: In-house counsel on the US patent landscape

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Survey: In-house counsel on the US patent landscape

surveyfinalcover.jpg

Fifty four in-house counsel took our survey on how the US patent pendulum has moved and how the courts and the USPTO have changed

Change to the US patent landscape has been controversial. What one lawyer thinks is a common-sense measure to cut down on bad patents, another might consider a disaster designed to kill innovation in an industry.

As IP in-house counsel consider how legislative reforms, courts conducting hearings remotely because of COVID-19, and the 2020 presidential elections will affect their IP strategies, we wanted to understand how they felt about the state of the US patent landscape.

The 54 in-house lawyers who took our survey weighed in on Andrei Iancu’s appointment to director of the USPTO, the PTAB and where the patent pendulum is swinging.

Section one: Broad concerns

In part one, more lawyers thought President Donald Trump’s views on IP were better for their business than those of the Democratic Party’s Joe Biden, but the majority of respondents said either that they ‘didn’t know’ whose IP views among the two men would be better for their businesses or that neither’s were. And while most counsel said the US is not too patent friendly, they were divided on how the pendulum is swinging. Read more here.

Section two: The courts

In part two, respondents said that they wanted to see more remote hearings in the future and that Delaware was their preferred court to litigate in. Read more here.

Section three: The USPTO

In part three, a large majority of respondents said director Iancu was doing a good job, but there was no clear consensus on the PTAB. Read more here.



more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Attorneys explain why there are early signs that the US Supreme Court could rule in favour of ISP Cox in a copyright dispute
A swathe of UPC-related hires suggests firms are taking the forum seriously, as questions over the transitional stage begin
A win for Nintendo in China and King & Spalding hiring a prominent patent litigator were also among the top talking points
Rebecca Newman at Addleshaw Goddard, who live-reported on the seminal dispute, unpicks the trials and tribulations of the case and considers its impact
Attorneys predict how Lululemon’s trade dress and design patent suit against Costco could play out
Lawyers at Linklaters analyse some of the key UPC trends so far, and look ahead to life beyond the transition period
David Rodrigues, who previously worked at an IP boutique, said he may become more involved in transactional work at his new firm
Indian smartphone maker Lava must pay $2.3 million as a security deposit for past sales, as its dispute with Dolby over audio coding SEPs plays out
Powell Gilbert’s opening in Düsseldorf, complete with a new partner hire, continues this summer’s trend of UPC-related lateral movement
IP leaders at Brandsmiths and Bird & Bird, who were on opposing sides at the UK Supreme Court in Iconix v Dream Pairs, unpick the landmark case and its ramifications
Gift this article