SURVEY: What do you think of the US patent landscape?
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

SURVEY: What do you think of the US patent landscape?


Managing IP invites its in-house counsel readers to take its survey on how the US patent pendulum has moved and how the courts and USPTO have changed

If you are an in-house lawyer, please take our in-house focused survey on the US patent landscape here: TAKE THE SURVEY

The survey contains 16 questions that are broken into three sections, and that should not take longer than six minutes to complete. The more responses we get, the more illuminating the final report will be. 


Your participation in this survey is confidential. Data collected will not be shared with third parties and will only be published in an AGGREGATED and ANONYMISED form.

Questions allow you to select “don’t know” as an option, so if you can’t comment on certain parts of the survey, we still want your response.

The survey

Change to the patent landscape has been prevalent and controversial. What one lawyer thinks is a common-sense measure to cut down on bad patents another might consider a disaster designed to kill innovation in an industry.

As IP in-house counsel consider how measures like legislative reforms, the rise of the Western District of Texas, and standard essential patents will affect their companies’ IP rights, we want to understand how they feel about the state of the patent landscape.

The survey will be divided into three sections.

Section one: Broad concerns

Is the US becoming more or less patent friendly? What’s the biggest patent-related challenge your company faces? In this section, we’ll ask you a range of questions about IP law issues most relevant to your business.  

Section two: The courts

What’s your impression of the PTAB? And what’s the best district court to litigate in for patent matters? We want to know how you best utilise the courts and what you would like to see them look like in the future.

Section three: The USPTO

How do you feel about director Andrei Iancu’s performance? And what changes would you like to see the IP office make? The USPTO’s role in granting patents to inventors and implementing judicial and legislative changes makes it a crucial part of any patent prosecutor’s career. We want your answers on how the office can best be of service to you.

The results

The results will be released in a three-part report, which will be published in May and include additional analysis from lawyers. We hope the final report will provide valuable insight on how in-house lawyers feel about the patent landscape.

Thank you for your time and I hope you enjoy filling in the survey. 

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

A senior USPTO attorney spoke at a Nokia-sponsored event on the EU’s proposed SEP Regulation today, November 29
IP counsel are ‘flooded’ with queries from clients worried about deepfakes, but the law has so far come up short
Each week Managing IP speaks to a different IP practitioner about their life and career
Mathys & Squire has filed a test case that the firm hopes will make UPC pleadings available by default
Multiple representatives and their teams can now work on cases using the online CMS, but not everyone can submit documents
James Lawrence, partner at Addisons, explains how he convinced the full Federal Court of Australia to back his client in a patent dispute concerning mining safety equipment
The deal will allow the companies to use each other’s patents covering 4G and 5G technologies, and other cellular SEPs
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis coverage from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Three lead IP counsel in the US, the UK and China share how they walk the fine line between building in-house competence and splurging on external lawyers
Mike Renaud, head of the IP division at Mintz, explains his business strategy and how the firm justifies charging higher rates