German Federal Constitutional Court declares UPC approval void
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

German Federal Constitutional Court declares UPC approval void

 German Federal Constitutional Court

In a ruling handed down this morning, March 20, Germany’s top constitutional court said the parliament did not approve the UPC legislation with the required two-thirds majority

Germany’s pre-ratification of the Unified Patent Court is void, according to a Federal Constitutional Court ruling handed down this morning.

The decision all but kills any realistic prospect of the project coming into fruition any time soon.

The long-awaited ruling declared that the act approving the UPC Agreement was not approved by the required two-thirds majority in Germany’s parliament, the Bundestag.

According to the FCC, the draft of the challenged act of approval was adopted unanimously by the Bundestag in the third reading but only by about 35 members. “Neither was the presence of the required quorum determined, nor did the president of the Bundestag declare that the act of approval had been adopted by a qualified majority.”

The FCC continued: “An act of approval to an international treaty that has been adopted in violation thereof cannot provide democratic legitimation for the exercise of public authority by the EU or any other international institution supplementary to or otherwise closely tied to the EU.”

Three of the court’s eight justices offered dissenting opinions. 

The timing of today’s judgment is in line with the estimate given to Managing IP by Justice Peter Huber. In an exclusive interview in November last year, Huber said the case would be decided in the first quarter of 2020.

The decision means the UPC now faces the real prospect of falling apart entirely. The constitutional challenge was seen as one of the major hurdles facing UPC ratification.

Germany, France and the UK were originally required to ratify it before it could come into force. 

Last month the UK ended speculation that it would remain a member of the UPC post-Brexit by revealing that it would not seek to participate in the court system and concurrent unitary patent project.

A spokesperson for the prime minister said participating in a court that applies EU law and is bound by the Court of Justice of the EU is “clearly inconsistent with our objective of becoming an independent self-governing nation”.

Shortly after that announcement, EPO president Antonio Campinos conceded that the proposed unitary patent may appear less attractive without the UK, but insisted that with the political will to make it happen, the project could still be a success.

Managing IP will bring you further in-depth analysis of the FCC’s decision and its ramifications in the coming days.

To view our recent UPC coverage, click on the links below:

UPC: The rocky road forward

UK’s UPC shun could spark EPO prosecution snub

UPC: Lawyers debate where the UK’s seat should go

UPC without UK still attractive to most businesses

Brexiting the UPC: What next for the UK? 

EPO president: UK’s UPC withdrawal 'not a decisive blow'

Confirmed: UK to shun unitary patent and UPC

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

A senior USPTO attorney spoke at a Nokia-sponsored event on the EU’s proposed SEP Regulation today, November 29
IP counsel are ‘flooded’ with queries from clients worried about deepfakes, but the law has so far come up short
Each week Managing IP speaks to a different IP practitioner about their life and career
Mathys & Squire has filed a test case that the firm hopes will make UPC pleadings available by default
Multiple representatives and their teams can now work on cases using the online CMS, but not everyone can submit documents
James Lawrence, partner at Addisons, explains how he convinced the full Federal Court of Australia to back his client in a patent dispute concerning mining safety equipment
The deal will allow the companies to use each other’s patents covering 4G and 5G technologies, and other cellular SEPs
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis coverage from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Three lead IP counsel in the US, the UK and China share how they walk the fine line between building in-house competence and splurging on external lawyers
Mike Renaud, head of the IP division at Mintz, explains his business strategy and how the firm justifies charging higher rates