Austria: Cancellation of trademark licences proves difficult
Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX
Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Austria: Cancellation of trademark licences proves difficult

Sponsored by


The owner of the trademarks "Miss Austria", "Miss Oberösterreich" (Miss Upper Austria) and further Miss-marks granted a licence to the defendant to use these marks for five years. These trademarks – as one can guess – are registered for an organisation handling beauty contests and the elections of the most beautiful women in an area. The contract contains a clause that allows immediate cancellation of the licence if there is violation by the licensee of any contractual duty. It also prohibits competition by the licensee in this field outside the licence and the use of similar trademarks to those licensed.

The trademark owner and licensor declared two years later the immediate cancellation of the licence for breach of contract and sued for cessation of use of his trademarks by the licensee and defendant in connection with the announcement and promotion of beauty contests. All three instances dismissed the complaint and held the contract in force.

What had the licensee done? He had organised and promoted in Oberösterreich (Upper Austria) a beauty contest under the name "Miss Countess". The licensor was of the opinion that this action violated the prohibition on competitive activities since it lacked an intimate connection with Upper Austria. It also violated the prohibition on use of similar trademarks.

The court did not find this convincing. It found out that the beauty contest "Miss Countess" was an official preliminary contest to the final beauty contest "Miss Oberösterreich" (Miss Upper Austria) and therefore was not an event in competition with "Miss Oberösterreich" and also did not lack an intimate connection with Upper Austria as stated by the plaintiff. With regard to the use of similar trademarks, it was held that here the use of "Miss Countess" as a denomination for the pre-contest was not as a trademark and also the plaintiff from the beginning did not see it as such. Therefore, this point was irrelevant.

This decision shows that in Austria, it is not easy to dissolve a contract which is no longer wanted by one of the parties. Of course, if both parties concur, they can easily rescind the entire contract.

Helmut Sonn

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Tony Nguyen, who returned to Fish & Richardson this month after a year travelling overseas, tells Managing IP how and why he took the plunge
Tom Treutler, who previously managed the Vietnamese office of Tilleke & Gibbins, has joined East IP
Counsel discuss upcoming AI and data privacy legislation and what they’ve learned since Chile joined the Madrid Protocol
INTA has postponed its planned Annual Meeting in Dubai, but the organisation should think carefully about whether it wants to go there at all
The firm has named its new managing director after its former Asia head resigned earlier this year
As law firms explore how best to support clients at the UPC, members of the UPCLA network believe they have found the best of both worlds
The Industry Patent Quality Charter hosted a conference in which it discussed the importance of granting high-quality patents
Julia Holden explains why, if she weren’t in IP, she would be directing and producing live English-language theatre
The impact of the recently agreed treaty may be modest at first but is likely to become more significant over time
Meet the esteemed judges who are assessing the first-ever Social Impact Awards
Gift this article