Austria: Cancellation of trademark licences proves difficult
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Austria: Cancellation of trademark licences proves difficult

Sponsored by


The owner of the trademarks "Miss Austria", "Miss Oberösterreich" (Miss Upper Austria) and further Miss-marks granted a licence to the defendant to use these marks for five years. These trademarks – as one can guess – are registered for an organisation handling beauty contests and the elections of the most beautiful women in an area. The contract contains a clause that allows immediate cancellation of the licence if there is violation by the licensee of any contractual duty. It also prohibits competition by the licensee in this field outside the licence and the use of similar trademarks to those licensed.

The trademark owner and licensor declared two years later the immediate cancellation of the licence for breach of contract and sued for cessation of use of his trademarks by the licensee and defendant in connection with the announcement and promotion of beauty contests. All three instances dismissed the complaint and held the contract in force.

What had the licensee done? He had organised and promoted in Oberösterreich (Upper Austria) a beauty contest under the name "Miss Countess". The licensor was of the opinion that this action violated the prohibition on competitive activities since it lacked an intimate connection with Upper Austria. It also violated the prohibition on use of similar trademarks.

The court did not find this convincing. It found out that the beauty contest "Miss Countess" was an official preliminary contest to the final beauty contest "Miss Oberösterreich" (Miss Upper Austria) and therefore was not an event in competition with "Miss Oberösterreich" and also did not lack an intimate connection with Upper Austria as stated by the plaintiff. With regard to the use of similar trademarks, it was held that here the use of "Miss Countess" as a denomination for the pre-contest was not as a trademark and also the plaintiff from the beginning did not see it as such. Therefore, this point was irrelevant.

This decision shows that in Austria, it is not easy to dissolve a contract which is no longer wanted by one of the parties. Of course, if both parties concur, they can easily rescind the entire contract.

Helmut Sonn

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The deal could help Rouse gain a foothold in Australia and New Zealand for the first time
With a team of more than 80 patent lawyers and attorneys across 21 European offices, the firm is acting in some of the most high-profile UPC cases
Lippes Mathias has hired three partners and a counsel from Offit Kurman
External counsel for automotive companies explain how trends such as AI and vehicle connectivity are affecting their practices and reveal what their clients are prioritising
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis coverage from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
The winners of the awards will be revealed at a gala dinner in New York City on April 25
Counsel debate the potential outcome of SCOTUS’s latest copyright case after justices questioned whether they should dismiss it
Each week Managing IP speaks to a different IP lawyer about their life and career
The small Düsseldorf firm is making a big impact in the UPC. Founding partner Christof Augenstein explains why
The court criticised Oppo’s attempts to delay proceedings and imposed a penalty, adding that the Chinese company may need to pay more if the trial isn’t concluded this year
Gift this article