UPC without UK still attractive to most businesses
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

UPC without UK still attractive to most businesses


In a Managing IP poll of more than 100 in-house counsel, 70% of respondents said a harmonised European patent system would still be desirable without the UK as a member

Despite the UK government announcing last week that it would not seek membership of the Unified Patent Court, it seems that most businesses would still like the harmonised patent project in Europe to go ahead.

In a Managing IP survey of more than 100 in-house counsel from different jurisdictions and industries, 70% of respondents said the UPC and unitary patent system would still be attractive to them and their businesses.


When the data is filtered by ‘yes’ and ‘no’ responses to exclude respondents for whom the UPC was never attractive or who didn’t know if the system would still be desirable without the UK, more than four fifths (87%) suggested that they would like to see the system go ahead.


When asked why the UPC would or would not be attractive without the UK, many of those who said it would still be desirable reasoned that the system would still cover up to 27 EU member states, which would have obvious efficiency and cost-saving benefits.

Several survey takers added that, while the UPC is inevitably not as attractive now as it would have been with the UK and its judges involved, the opportunity to increase harmonisation and reduce uncertainty is still an attractive prospect.

“Ultimately, if an efficient patent system and court can be structured in a way that creates a common understanding and reduces uncertainty in enforceability and validity across the continent – while unfortunately without the involvement of one major economy – we should still strive to reach have that system,” says the head of patents at a car maker in the US.

The head of IP at a telecoms company in Germany says that the UK’s importance to his business has decreased tremendously since Brexit, apart from in some special business areas. Far from lamenting the loss of UK judges to the system, he believes the UPC will benefit from increased consistency.

“Without UK judges, consistency of the UPC's decision making will be rather increased. Furthermore, even if you only consider Germany, France and Italy, those countries constitute a huge market that is reached by a unitary patent, and by the related court.”

The chief IP counsel at a pharmaceutical manufacturer in the UK notes that the country is not the only important jurisdiction to large businesses.

“The world does not revolve around the UK,” he says. “UK-style patent litigation is not the be-all and end-all, and a pan-European patent prosecution and litigation system would still have some obvious attractions as compared with the current tapestry of national European patent litigation systems.”

These views fall in line with that of EPO president Antonio Campinos, who told delegates at Managing IP’s International Patent Forum yesterday that the UPC could still offer considerable reach and economic benefits to patent owners.

IP practitioners were shocked to learn last week from a government spokesperson that the UK would not seek membership of the UPC, despite the previous government having ratified the UPC Agreement (UPCA) in April 2018.

Those who still want to see the UPC go ahead are now looking to the Federal Constitutional Court to give a swift and positive ruling on UPCA constitutionality in Germany, and to European regional governments to push ahead with the harmonised patent project.

If the UPC system doesn’t go ahead, it certainly won’t be because of a lack of support among patent-focused businesses.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Malisheia Douglas, who spent six years at Eaton Corporation, said she was attracted by the firm's global footprint
The European Parliament has voted in favour of overhauling the SEP framework, a proposal that has sparked deep division among patent owners and implementers
Daniel Poh talks about his journey to becoming managing partner and how firms can win new business from Chinese companies
Missing a deadline can have serious consequences but law firms should consider being lenient to those responsible
Each week Managing IP speaks to a different IP practitioner about their life and career
CMS, which was told to respond to a cancellation action by February 12 but filed its response a day later, has rowed back on claims about an IT error
The deal could help Rouse gain a foothold in Australia and New Zealand for the first time
With a team of more than 80 patent lawyers and attorneys across 21 European offices, the firm is acting in some of the most high-profile UPC cases
Lippes Mathias has hired three partners and a counsel from Offit Kurman
External counsel for automotive companies explain how trends such as AI and vehicle connectivity are affecting their practices and reveal what their clients are prioritising
Gift this article