Survey: Latin America: On the cusp of new technologies

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Survey: Latin America: On the cusp of new technologies

Patent practitioners in Argentina, Brazil and Mexico are grappling with the boom in new technologies. Ingrid Hering investigates how attorneys, patent offices and courts are coping with the new challenges

Argentina (34)

Rank

Firm

City

1 (1)

Marval O'Farrell & Mairal

Buenos Aires

2 (2)

G Breuer

Buenos Aires

3 (6)

Richelet & Richelet

Buenos Aires

4 (-)

Clarke Modet & Cia

Buenos Aires

5 (3)

Moeller & Co

Buenos Aires

6 (10)

Barbat & Cia

Buenos Aires

7 (-)

Palacio & Asociados

Buenos Aires

8 (8)

Sena & Berton Moreno

Buenos Aires

9 (5)

Muchall SRL

Buenos Aires

10 (7)

Obligado & Cia Lda

Buenos Aires

Brazil (29)

Rank

Firm

City

1 (1)

Dannemann Siemsen Bigler & Ipanema-Moreira

Rio de Janeiro

2 (2)

Momsen, Leonardos & Cia

Rio de Janeiro

3 (3)

Daniel & Cia

Rio de Janeiro

4 (5)

Tinoco Soares & Filho S/C Ltda

Rio de Janeiro

5 (-)

Advocacia Pietro Ariboni S/C

Rio de Janeiro

6 (-)

Custodio de Almeida & Cia

Rio de Janeiro

7 (-)

David do Nascimiento Advogados

Rio de Janeiro

8 (-)

Clarke Modet do Brasil Ltda

Rio de Janeiro

9 (8)

Pinheiro Nunes Arnaud & Scatamburlo, PC

Rio de Janeiro

10 (-)

Tavares & Cia

Rio de Janeiro



Mexico (27)

Rank

Firm

City

1 (1)

Olivares & Cia

Mexico City

2 (2)

Uhthoff Gomez-Vega & Uhthoff SC

Mexico City

3 (8)

Becerril Coca & Becerril

Mexico City

4 (5)

Clarke Modet & Cia de Mexico

Mexico City

5 (7)

Basham Ringe y Correa SC

Mexico City

6 (3)

Goodrich Riquelme & Asociados

Mexico City

7 (-)

Panamericana de Patentes y Marcas SC

Mexico City

8 (-)

Bufete Soni

Mexico City

9 (4)

Gonzalez Rossi & Asociados

Mexico City

10 (-)

Dumont Bergman Bider & Co, SC

Mexico City



Traditional mechanical and electrical patents are still holding their own in the economies of Brazil, Argentina and Mexico. But in a sign of the times firms are increasingly handling patent prosecution and litigation in the chemical and technology-related fields.

Ivan Ahlert, of Brazilian IP firm Dannemann, Siemsen, Bigler & Ipanema Moreira, has seen an increase in pharmaceutical litigation in the past two years as a result of patents for pharmaceutical products and processes being granted since 1997. His firm has also been busy filing patents for inventions related to the internet, such as business methods, mostly filed by US companies.

In Argentina, Carlos Alonso, head of patents at Marval O'Farrell & Mairal, estimates that 60% to 70% of the firm's patent filing work relates to chemical inventions, of which about 40% to 50% are pharmaceutical products. Marval O'Farrell files an average of 150 patent applications a month. Apart from Argentina, most of these are filed in Europe, the US, Japan and the rest in other Latin American countries.

"The pharmaceutical business in Argentina is quite developed," Alonso explains. "We have many foreign laboratories who file here, as well as local ones." Foreign pharmaceutical companies active in Argentina include Bayer, GSK, American Home Products, Merck, Aventis and Roche. In Mexico there has been a surge in computer-related inventions such as business methods and e-commerce, says Cesar Ramos, head of patents at IP firm Olivares & Cia.

Olivares' patent work is evenly distributed between chemical and related patents, including pharmaceuticals and biotechnology; and mechanical and electrical inventions, including computer technology. Litigation in the pharmaceuticals sector in Mexico is especially active. "We had a pipeline process in filing patents for pharmaceuticals between 1991 and 1992. Now that owners have their patents, they are enforcing them very aggressively," he adds.

"We service a lot of foreign clients, almost predominantly so, mainly from the US but also Europe, Japan and other Latin American countries," Ramos says. "However local companies are more aware than before about IP protection, not only the prosecution phase but also in litigation."

Big challenges ahead

As in other jurisdictions, the Brazilian Patent Office is grappling with the number and complexity of patent filings and recently hired 80 new examiners. Ahlert says his firm has been involved in efforts to train examiners and assist the Office in examining more efficiently.

The Argentine Patent Office is struggling with the increased workload brought about by the country's legislation that now requires patent applications to be published. Alonso says that the office, which currently has about 50 examiners, needs at least another 30 or 40 more to cope but lacks the funds. Now, once an application has been filed it takes more than two years to be published. The examination process takes place four to five years after the filing date.

The Mexican Patent Office is tackling its backlog of work by hiring and training more examiners, but there is the related problem of the high number of court cases waiting to be heard because patent infringement and validity issues are handled in the first instance by the Patent Office. The Office's decision can then be appealed in the courts.

In Brazil there is concern about increasing government intervention in the pharmaceutical sector, with some local companies obtaining government authorization to sell, but not yet manufacture, products that are protected. Ahlert believes that patents for AIDS drugs have become a pressure tool to secure lower prices on medicines used in public health programmes for chronic diseases. "They are being used in a political manner, it is not their actual intent to grant the licence," he says.

There is also tension about the contradiction between TRIPs and national legislation that rejects pending applications relating to matter that was unpatentable before 1995, such as pharmaceutical products and food. Another area of disquiet is what Ahlert describes as the discriminatory law that authorizes pharmaceutical patents to be issued by the National Agency for Sanitary Surveillance, which also contradicts TRIPs.

Argentina is contemplating joining the PCT, following the lead of other Latin American countries that have already done so including Columbia, Brazil, Ecuador and Mexico. Alonso believes this should encourage more foreign patents to be filed in the country. In Mexico a legislative review is being considered primarily to improve IP enforcement, says Ramos. And the Brazilian patent community is hopeful that the government will extend to 20 years the term of all patents that were in force on January 1 2000, in accordance with a WTO determination.

In-house view: ELC Brazilian company ELC was established 30 years ago with the granting of a patent both locally and in the US for a plastic security seal that eliminated the use of lead. Now with more than 400 employees and offices in California, Rio de Janeiro, and Rome, the company continues to file patents for related products that are used in industries including chemical, oil, banking, gas and water.

From its beginnings ELC has collaborated with Brazilian firm Dannemann, Siemsen, Bigler & Ipanema Moreira in developing its global patent strategy. However the company's filing strategy does not centre on Brazil. ?One of the problems we have in Brazil is that patents are unfortunately not as valuable as in the more developed countries,? explains Andre de Lima Castro, whose father Edurdo de Lima Castro Netto founded the company.

?We have several patents for security-sealing devices but most of those patents are not in Brazil. Our company has been successful in using patents but lately we have been forced not to invest too much because we invent a product but people have copied it. We fight it, but in the end we have to enter an agreement because it takes too much time and money to pursue law suits in Brazil.?

For Castro, Brazil is the weak link in ELC's business strategy that uses its patents to win contracts with foreign customers such as the United States Postal Service. ?In Brazil we do not enjoy the same success because the government does not give a lot of incentives to people who develop technology,? Castro laments.

The company has had a lot of problems in Italy as well, where two of its products were copied by a former Italian distributor and sold there using the company's name and technology. The court case has lasted 10 years. Now, says Castro, the company avoids filing patents in Italy and Brazil because the time it takes to fight an infringement can be longer than the life of the patent.



more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

AI, cybersecurity and data practice group will provide clients with legal guidance around AI alongside a 'deep technical foundation’ in IP
Lawyers at Vondst and Biopatents say a ruling concerning the protected status of trade secrets could see the UPC flooded with requests to prevent access to confidential information
Sharad Vadehra of Kan & Krishme discusses why older IP firms still have an edge over up-and-coming boutiques and how the firm is using AI to provide quick and cost-effective service
Lawyers at Appleyard Lees share how they picked apart a plant breeder’s infringement claims concerning the ‘Tango’ mandarin
A further decision on long-arm status, and a new hire for Pentarc in Germany from Taylor Wessing were also among top developments
The US decision marks a rare grant of a request under the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act in a patent case
Stobbs has applied to strike out a contempt of court application filed against the firm and two of its lawyers
With trademark volumes surging, trademark teams need to think beyond traditional clearance searches, towards a continuous, intelligence-led workflow, says Meghan Medeiros of Corsearch
Brazilian in-house counsel say law firms’ technology investments have not translated into tangible benefits, meaning tech use is a minor factor when selecting advisers
A lack of comfort among some salaried partners shows why law firms must actively foster inclusion, not merely focus on diversity mandates
Gift this article