Apple and Samsung drop non-US patent litigation

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Apple and Samsung drop non-US patent litigation

The global patent battle between Apple and Samsung has elicited tens of thousands of news stories around the world. Their decision to end the litigation everywhere outside the US was revealed in a two-line statement today

apple20samsung20phones20200.jpg

“Samsung and Apple have agreed to drop all litigation between the two companies outside the United States,” said Samsung. “This agreement does not involve any licensing arrangements, and the companies are continuing to pursue the existing cases in US courts.”

The move marks the end of pending litigation in South Korea, Australia, Germany, France, Italy, the UK, the Netherlands, and Japan.

The litigation between the two smartphone makers has proved lucrative for firms of lawyers and patent attorneys around the world. You can read about the firms acting for Apple and Samsung, as well as other players in the smartphone patent battles, in Managing IP.

In May this year a California jury chose to leave the total damages awarded to Apple against Samsung at $119.5 million in a case related to the related to the Korean company’s Galaxy S2 smartphone. The amount was far below the $2 billion Apple was seeking.

The jury also awarded Samsung damages of $158,400 for Apple infringing its '449 patent for recoding and reproducing image and speech. The jury found, however, that Samsung's '239 patent for a remote video transmission system had not been infringed. Samsung had been seeking $6 million in damages.

Florian_Mueller_Foss_Patents

Analyst Florian Müller (pictured left) wrote on his FOSS Patents blog that Apple may file a third US Apple v Samsung lawsuit. But he added: “that appears less likely to me than another possibility. It may very well be that at this point Apple just hopes for a somewhat face-saving exit by collecting a significant damages award (or, more likely, obtaining a settlement before it gets there) based on, for the most part, design patents.”

While the patent battles between Apple and Samsung have been raging, the South Korean company has been notching up sales of its smartphone products, particularly outside the United States. In the first quarter of this year Samsung shipped twice as many smartphones as its US rival, according to Strategy Analytics.

The same analysts reported last month that the Android operating system used by Samsung now has an 85% share of the global smartphone market.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

VO, which has offices in the Netherlands, Belgium and Germany, is the second European IP firm to secure external backing this week
The Bardehle Pagenberg attorneys-at-law discuss the firm’s Managing IP EMEA Awards 2026 success, Unified Patent Court litigation strategy, and evolving European patent trends
A patent battle between two legal tech companies and a loss for Elon Musk’s xAI against OpenAI were also among the top talking points
With drug prices a hot topic in the US, courts are seemingly more reluctant to prevent the entry of generics to the market
Academic Eden Sarid joins us during Pride Month to discuss queer expression and IP law, Patagonia v Pattie Gonia, and how queer and AI-generated creations both pose novelty concerns
Patent attorney Michael Henson joins the firm to lead its freshly launched blockchain and digital assets practice
A dispute over mammogram technology, and a development in the case between GSK and Moderna were also among the top talking points in recent weeks
With rankings for Western Europe set to be published on June 25, we sat down with our research lead to find out what practitioners and law firms can expect
Peter O’Sullivan, a professional services executive, says he is looking forward to helping Pearce IP become the leading life sciences firm in Australia and New Zealand
Matteo Di Lernia, advocate at LCA Studio Legale, unpicks the CJEU’s ruling in M.M. Ristorazione v Villa Ramazzini, including its impact on litigation strategies
Gift this article