Stokke suffers CJEU blow over shape marks

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Stokke suffers CJEU blow over shape marks

The Norwegian maker of Tripp Trapp highchairs has suffered a setback in its battle to protect the shape of its products after the Court of Justice of the EU ruled that EU law can preclude the registration of shapes required by the function of a product

tripp-trapp.jpg

Stokke has been in a long-running battle with Germany’s Hauck, which makes two models of chairs called the Alpha and the Beta. Stokke sued Hauck, claiming that the German company’s designs infringed its copyright in its L-shaped chairs and the rights deriving from its registered trade mark in the Benelux. Hauck claimed that the trade mark was invalid.

In 2000 a Dutch court upheld Stokke’s claim with regard to copyright, but also upheld Hauck’s counterclaim seeking a declaration that the trade mark was invalid.

On appeal the Supreme Court of the Netherlands asked the CJEU to clarify the rules on the registration of a mark consisting of the shape of a product.

Yesterday the Court ruled that registration as a trade mark of shapes required by the function of a product and of shapes which give substantial value to a product with several characteristics may be precluded under EU law.

It said that reserving the benefit of such shapes to a single operator would grant a monopoly over the essential characteristics of goods, which would undermine the objective of trade mark protection.

The case will now return to the Dutch courts for a final decision.




more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Sheppard has added quantum and robotics expertise to its AI industry team to help clients navigate questions around inventorship and IP infringement
The 2026 Americas ceremony recognised outstanding firms and practitioners, along with highlighting impact cases of the year
A development concerning Stephen Thaler’s AI copyright application in India and an integration between IPH group firms were also among the top talking points
As concerns around the little-known litigation tool increase, practitioners say they are educating their clients on how it can be most effective
Kilburn & Strode and Mewburn Ellis are just two firms that have invested heavily in office space – a sign that the legal industry is serious about in-person working
In major recent developments, Dyson snagged another win against Hong Kong-based competitor Dreame and a new AI-powered UPC platform was launched
Mohit and Sidhant Goel decided not to pursue an interim injunction application so that their client, Communications Components Antenna, could benefit from a fast-track trial
Anita Cade, head of Ashurst’s IP and media team in Australia, discusses why law firms that can pull together capability across different practice areas and jurisdictions stand to gain
INTA’s CEO says London-based firms have registered fewer delegates compared to past meetings in San Diego and Atlanta, and questions the 'ethics' of trying to participate without registering
Lobbies and interest groups are among the interveners in a major dispute over whether courts can set patent pool rates
Gift this article