Interview: Clemens Heusch of Nokia on judges at the UPC

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Interview: Clemens Heusch of Nokia on judges at the UPC

The most important issue for the planned Unified Patent Court is the quality of the judges, Clemens Heusch of Nokia told Managing IP in a recent interview

Speaking during the Patent Reform Forum held in Munich on September 9, Heusch, head of European litigation at the telecoms company, said: “The most decisive thing is that we get good judges, because the procedure is only helpful if we get good quality judgments. If they are overturned on appeal, they are not helpful in the end.”

He added that while there are still concerns about issues such as procedural rules, IT and logistics, “with good judges we will get this running”.

Several hundred legal and technical judges have been identified already, but Heusch said it is vital to ensure the best ones are chosen: “I’m a little bit concerned that we have too many political factors to take into account, like nationality. I don’t care whether the judge is from England, France, Germany or Portugal as long as he or she is good.”

He also said he expects the Unitary Patent and UPC to be widely used after a warm-up phase, noting that it offers attractions such as pan-European injunctions to patentees.

Watch the full interview here:


See all the interviews from Munich on Managing IP's YouTube channel. Note that all speakers are talking in a personal capacity, and their views are not necessarily those of their employers or clients.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Partner Rob Jacob unveils plans to offer a beginning-to-end trademark service, how to make prosecution profitable, and why IP ‘buy-in’ from the CEO stands the firm in good stead
Sponsored by CAS
CAS provides practical pointers on how intellectual property and R&D teams can work in tandem to unlock tangible benefits and avoid wasted spend
Sponsored by CAS
CAS explores how AI is transforming intellectual property, from inventorship and copyright disputes to new demands on patent attorneys
Sponsored by That.Legal
Gillian Tan of That.Legal discusses a recent decision by the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore and what it reveals about the evidential burden in bad-faith trademark claims
Attorneys at Di Blasi, Parente & Associados share how the protection of trade secrets strengthens innovation by bringing together legal practice, regulatory developments, and established international references
Jin Ooi, who joins as a partner today, said he is excited to offer a ‘rounded’ IP service as the firm deepens its litigation expertise in the UK and Europe
As generics celebrate, practitioners believe innovator companies should brace for an ‘uphill battle’ when trying to prove induced infringement
A team from Cooley shares how they overturned a massive damages award by emphasising that the opposing company’s trade secrets claims were time-barred
Sponsored by Licks Attorneys
Eduardo Hallak, Rafaella Oliveira, and Laís Souza of Licks Attorneys explain how the provision operates in practice, highlighting evidential hurdles and best practices for patent applicants
Sponsored by Liu, Shen & Associates
Chunyu Cui and Ziqing Wu of Liu, Shen & Associates say recent trends in China’s intellectual property courts indicate alignment with international standards and send a clear signal to the global market
Gift this article