New Zealand’s new patent law comes into effect

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

New Zealand’s new patent law comes into effect

New Zealand’s new patent law gets rid of some outdated provisions, expand third party actions and addresses software patent issues

The new Patent Law, which passed last year and came into effect on Friday, replaced a law that was over 60 years old.

Given the age of the previous law, it is not surprising that the new law addresses several unique quirks. For example, New Zealand examiners previously examined applications for novelty but not obviousness, though third parties could challenge a patent on obviousness grounds. Under the new law, patent applications will be examined for obviousness.

Similarly, under the new law, New Zealand also finally has a worldwide novelty requirement. Under the old law, novelty was only examined as to whether the invention was disclosed in New Zealand.

The law also looks to make it easier for third parties to challenge patents both pre- and post-grant. Furthermore, patent applications will automatically be published 18 months after the earliest priority date, making it easier for third parties to submit relevant prior art.

The new law also excludes from patentability computer programs “as such”, though it is expected that the presence of a technical effect will allow inventions to get around this “as such” exclusion.

For more on the new law, see our previous coverage.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Partner Rob Jacob unveils plans to offer a beginning-to-end trademark service, how to make prosecution profitable, and why IP ‘buy-in’ from the CEO stands the firm in good stead
Sponsored by CAS
CAS provides practical pointers on how intellectual property and R&D teams can work in tandem to unlock tangible benefits and avoid wasted spend
Sponsored by CAS
CAS explores how AI is transforming intellectual property, from inventorship and copyright disputes to new demands on patent attorneys
Sponsored by That.Legal
Gillian Tan of That.Legal discusses a recent decision by the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore and what it reveals about the evidential burden in bad-faith trademark claims
Attorneys at Di Blasi, Parente & Associados share how the protection of trade secrets strengthens innovation by bringing together legal practice, regulatory developments, and established international references
Jin Ooi, who joins as a partner today, said he is excited to offer a ‘rounded’ IP service as the firm deepens its litigation expertise in the UK and Europe
As generics celebrate, practitioners believe innovator companies should brace for an ‘uphill battle’ when trying to prove induced infringement
A team from Cooley shares how they overturned a massive damages award by emphasising that the opposing company’s trade secrets claims were time-barred
Sponsored by Licks Attorneys
Eduardo Hallak, Rafaella Oliveira, and Laís Souza of Licks Attorneys explain how the provision operates in practice, highlighting evidential hurdles and best practices for patent applicants
Sponsored by Liu, Shen & Associates
Chunyu Cui and Ziqing Wu of Liu, Shen & Associates say recent trends in China’s intellectual property courts indicate alignment with international standards and send a clear signal to the global market
Gift this article