New Zealand’s new patent law comes into effect

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

New Zealand’s new patent law comes into effect

New Zealand’s new patent law gets rid of some outdated provisions, expand third party actions and addresses software patent issues

The new Patent Law, which passed last year and came into effect on Friday, replaced a law that was over 60 years old.

Given the age of the previous law, it is not surprising that the new law addresses several unique quirks. For example, New Zealand examiners previously examined applications for novelty but not obviousness, though third parties could challenge a patent on obviousness grounds. Under the new law, patent applications will be examined for obviousness.

Similarly, under the new law, New Zealand also finally has a worldwide novelty requirement. Under the old law, novelty was only examined as to whether the invention was disclosed in New Zealand.

The law also looks to make it easier for third parties to challenge patents both pre- and post-grant. Furthermore, patent applications will automatically be published 18 months after the earliest priority date, making it easier for third parties to submit relevant prior art.

The new law also excludes from patentability computer programs “as such”, though it is expected that the presence of a technical effect will allow inventions to get around this “as such” exclusion.

For more on the new law, see our previous coverage.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Brian Paul Gearing brings technical depth, litigation expertise, and experience with Japanese business culture to Pillsbury’s IP practice
News of InterDigital suing Amazon in the US and CMS IndusLaw challenging Indian rules on foreign firms were also among the top talking points
IP lawyers at three firms reflect on how courts across Australia have reacted to AI use in litigation, and explain why they support measured use of the technology
AJ Park’s owner, IPH, announced earlier this week that Steve Mitchell will take the reins of the New Zealand-based firm in January
Chris Adamson and Milli Bouri of Adamson & Partners join us to discuss IP market trends and what law firm and in-house clients are looking for
Noemi Parrotta, chair of the European subcommittee within INTA's International Amicus Committee, explains why the General Court’s decision in the Iceland case could make it impossible to protect country names as trademarks
Inès Garlantezec, who became principal of the firm’s Luxembourg office earlier this year, discusses what's been keeping her busy, including settling a long-running case
In the sixth episode of a podcast series celebrating the tenth anniversary of IP Inclusive, we discuss IP Futures, a network for early-career stage IP professionals
Rachel Cohen has reunited with her former colleagues to strengthen Weil’s IP litigation and strategy work
McKool Smith’s Jennifer Truelove explains how a joint effort between her firm and Irell & Manella secured a win for their client against Samsung
Gift this article