How to promote green technologies

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

How to promote green technologies

Industrialised countries should consider providing incentives to promote technology transfer with developing countries, according to a report published by AIPPI’s Standing Committee on “Intellectual Property and Green Technology”

Bertram Huber, Chair of the Committee, said the Committee started working on the climate change issue in early 2011, and began with a broad remit: “Where do we stand? What is available? Is the IP system structured properly?”

The report, presented at yesterday’s ExCo, finds that “fundamental changes in IP architecture and laws” are not needed to support climate change technologies. Huber told the Congress News it would be “close to impossible” to expect patent offices to make ethical decisions about green technologies.

Instead, the report proposes “a more creative and vigorous implementation of IP systems and related innovation infrastructure”, especially in developing countries. This includes IP asset development, strengthened education and innovation ecosystems, promotion of licensing and collaboration; incentives for industrialised country parties to participate in licensing with those in developing countries, better IP training programmes and use of patent information to facilitate dissemination of technical knowledge.

The latter includes the EPO’s classifications Y02 and Y04, and WIPO’s PATENTSCOPE, which the Committee says should be promoted. It would also like to see efforts to complete the scope of patent information digitally available, including from smaller IP offices.

The report supports the new WIPO GREEN programme to further voluntary licensing of green technology packages, and says its effectiveness should be ­evaluated.

“There is a preparedness from western companies to grant licences on preferential conditions to parties in developing countries, but the statistics show there is not much technology transfer and it is not happening efficiently,” said Huber. One reason is that infrastructure needs to be improved in recipient countries, but another is that incentives to encourage technology transfer are not sufficiently used.

He added that promoting technology transfer is a win-win: “The positive side effects include developing an innovation infrastructure in recipient countries, and developing new economies and markets.”

The Committee met yesterday afternoon to discuss further work, including whether a Working Question on green technologies should be proposed for a future Congress.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Attorneys explain why there are early signs that the US Supreme Court could rule in favour of ISP Cox in a copyright dispute
A swathe of UPC-related hires suggests firms are taking the forum seriously, as questions over the transitional stage begin
A win for Nintendo in China and King & Spalding hiring a prominent patent litigator were also among the top talking points
Rebecca Newman at Addleshaw Goddard, who live-reported on the seminal dispute, unpicks the trials and tribulations of the case and considers its impact
Attorneys predict how Lululemon’s trade dress and design patent suit against Costco could play out
Lawyers at Linklaters analyse some of the key UPC trends so far, and look ahead to life beyond the transition period
David Rodrigues, who previously worked at an IP boutique, said he may become more involved in transactional work at his new firm
Indian smartphone maker Lava must pay $2.3 million as a security deposit for past sales, as its dispute with Dolby over audio coding SEPs plays out
Powell Gilbert’s opening in Düsseldorf, complete with a new partner hire, continues this summer’s trend of UPC-related lateral movement
IP leaders at Brandsmiths and Bird & Bird, who were on opposing sides at the UK Supreme Court in Iconix v Dream Pairs, unpick the landmark case and its ramifications
Gift this article