Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Twitter paid $36 million to avoid patent lawsuit with IBM

Twitter paid $36 million to avoid a patent infringement suit with IBM, according to SEC documents made publicly available on Thursday


Last month, the two companies announced they had reached an agreement that settled a 2013 claim by IBM that the microblogging site infringed on three of its patents. But the financial terms of the deal were not disclosed.

The cost of the transaction was revealed last week when the SEC published Twitter’s Form 10-K, an annual disclosure of a company’s financial performance. The document also revealed that Twitter now owns 956 patents and has another 100 patent applications pending. Before it filed its IPO in November, Twitter owned just nine patents.

The dispute first became public in October last year, when Twitter revealed in its S-1 filing that IBM had invited it to "to negotiate a business resolution of the allegations.”

In the filing, Twitter wrote: “We believe we have meritorious defenses to IBM's allegations, although there can be no assurance that we will be successful in defending against these allegations or reaching a business resolution that is satisfactory to us.”

The patents at issue were US Patent No 6,957,224, relating to the efficient retrieval of uniform resource locators; No 7,072,849, relating to a method for presenting advertising in an interactive service; and No 7,099,862, relating to programmatic discovery of common contacts.

Under the deal announced in February, Twitter agreed to purchase more than 900 patents from IBM. The two companies also reached a cross-licensing agreement.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

While the rules allow foreign firms to open local offices and offer IP services, a ban on litigation and practising Indian law could mean little will change
A New York federal court heard oral arguments this week in a copyright case pitting publishing giants against a digital library
Commissioner Hamano Koichi shares his vision for the JPO and explains that IP offices must promote innovation that drives social change
The Asia-Pacific awards research cycle has now begun – don’t miss on this opportunity be recognised in 2023
The Supreme Court, which is hearing two IP cases this week, should limit the power of US courts to rule on foreign sales
Safety standards wouldn’t lose copyright protection when named in law, so long as they were accessible for free online
In-house tech sources say Amgen v Sanofi has the potential to stifle their prosecution and litigation strategies if SCOTUS’s decision is too broad
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis coverage from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
The Federal Circuit said tech firms can challenge the way the USPTO implemented Fintiv, but that won’t mean much for practitioners, say counsel
The England and Wales High Court handed down one of the most hotly anticipated FRAND rulings for some time