Google and Viacom settle long-running copyright dispute over YouTube

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Google and Viacom settle long-running copyright dispute over YouTube

Google and Viacom have reached an agreement that ends seven years of copyright litigation over Viacom’s claims that its programmes were posted on YouTube without permission

The dispute stems from 2007, when Viacom filed a $1 billion claim against YouTube and others. The parent company of networks including Nickelodeon, MTV and Comedy Central accused Google of broadcasting 79,000 unauthorised videos on YouTube between 2005 and 2008.

The terms of the settlement were not disclosed but Reuters reported that “a person close to the matter” who was not authorised to discuss the deal said no money exchanged hands.

In April last year, Manhattan District Judge Louis Stanton dismissed Viacom’s lawsuit against the video sharing site, ruling that it was protected by DMCA safe harbors. 

Today’s agreement ends Viacom’s appeal of that decision to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in New York. Oral arguments had been scheduled for March 24.

“Viacom's argument that the volume of material and ‘the absence of record evidence that would allow a jury to decide which clips-in-suit were specifically known to senior YouTube executives’… combine to deprive YouTube of the statutory safe harbor, is extravagant,” wrote Judge Stanton.

In a joint statement, the companies said: “Google and Viacom today jointly announced the resolution of the Viacom vs. YouTube copyright litigation. This settlement reflects the growing collaborative dialogue between our two companies on important opportunities, and we look forward to working more closely together.”

YouTube was acquired by Google for around $1.65 billion in 2006.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Yossi Sivan explains how Israeli judgment is a pro-brand owner departure from the norm and why it sends a strong message that corporate structures are not always a shield
Halim Shehadeh, group CEO of IP firm CWB, says that in the rush to discuss what AI can do, IP firms are overlooking the more important question of whether they are ready
Caitlin Heard, who formally joined the firm from CMS last month, says she is excited by the ‘energy’ of the London office
Ranjna Mehta-Dutt, who moved to Chadha & Chadha after 25 years at Remfry & Sagar, says the firm plans to expand its life sciences practice through targeted recruitment and dedicated teams for bigger clients
The initial contempt of court claim targeted Stobbs and the firm’s client for allegedly interfering with the administration of justice
Acquisition of platform developed by Boehmert & Boehmert lawyer set to create a combined platform for patent drafting and prosecution in Europe
Partner Rob Jacob unveils plans to offer a beginning-to-end trademark service, how to make prosecution profitable, and why IP ‘buy-in’ from the CEO stands the firm in good stead
Attorneys at Di Blasi, Parente & Associados share how the protection of trade secrets strengthens innovation by bringing together legal practice, regulatory developments, and established international references
Jin Ooi, who joins as a partner today, said he is excited to offer a ‘rounded’ IP service as the firm deepens its litigation expertise in the UK and Europe
As generics celebrate, practitioners believe innovator companies should brace for an ‘uphill battle’ when trying to prove induced infringement
Gift this article