High collecting society fees may be an abuse, says CJEU

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

High collecting society fees may be an abuse, says CJEU

The Court of Justice of the EU has ruled that the monopolies enjoyed by national collecting societies to collect copyright royalties are lawful, but that imposing high fees may amount to an abuse of a dominant position

The Court also ruled that a Czech law that exempted health establishments from paying royalties for music played to their guests was incompatible with the EU Copyright Directive.

The Court’s ruling, handed down today, relates to a row between Czech collecting society OSA and a thermal spa called Mariánské Lázně.

The dispute began when OSA tried to force the spa to pay royalties to it for providing guests with facilities to watch TV and listen to music in its rooms. Mariánské Lázně refused on the basis that Czech law allows medical establishments to make such broadcasts without paying royalties.

A court in Pilsen, the Krajský soud v Plzni, asked Europe’s top court whether the exemption granted to medical establishments by Czech law is compatible with EU law and whether the monopoly that OSA has within the Czech Republic for collecting royalties is compatible with the freedom to provide services and EU competition law.

It also asked the Court to consider a fundamental question about the way collecting societies operate across Europe: whether the monopoly that OSA has within the Czech Republic for collecting royalties is compatible with the freedom to provide services and EU competition law.

Today the Court decided that the monopoly that OSA has to collect royalties in the Czech Republic does amount to restriction on the freedom to provides services, since the spa was unable to choose to pay copyright fees to another collecting society. However, it said that the restriction is justified because there is no better way, at the moment, of protecting copyright in the EU.

Although the Court said that the monopoly granted by the Czech legislation to OSA is compatible with the freedom to provide services, the ruling may not be all good news for OSA. The Court said that if a collecting society charges fees that are appreciably higher than those levied in other member states, it could indicate that the collecting society is abusing its dominant position. Whether there is such abuse in this case will be for the referring Czech court to decide.

The ruling comes in the same month that EU member states adopted a directive on the way that collecting societies work. The directive on collective management of copyright and multiterritorial licensing of online music was adopted by the European Council unanimously last week (although some member states made statements about how they interpreted the new rules).

The directive will allow multi-territorial licensing of online music services and should increase the transparency of collecting societies by setting out minimum standards for the way they are governed and the timeliness with which they pay royalties to rights holders.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Boehringer Ingelheim has instructed a team from Kirkland, while Teva is being represented by Pinsent Masons
The Delhi High Court’s latest directions offer an opportunity to move beyond remedies against bad-faith registrations and address how suspicious applications are identified in the first place, says Fatima Baig at Lexlinc
Camilla Hamrin describes how the acquisition by Acapo Onsagers will impact Bergenstråhle’s trademark practice – and reflects on changes she has seen over 30 years in IP
On a recent trip to the French capital, we learned that the UPC is squeezing domestic litigation while firms are chasing senior talent, experimenting with AI and considering new ways of organising their practices
Daniel Law says a string of lateral hires and broader expansion plans will strengthen its position to capitalise on Brazil’s burgeoning IP and patent litigation market
Jason Raeburn’s arrival will expand the firm’s London footprint in AI, copyright and tech disputes
The firm is shaping its AI strategy around partnerships with Harvey and Legora alongside internally developed tools from its legal technology company, Eltemate
A dispute Down Under shows why trademark lawyers cannot afford to wait on the sidelines when a rival brand gathers momentum
The Third Circuit’s decision in Thomson Reuters v ROSS marks the first appellate-level decision addressing AI and fair use, prompting copyright counsel to consider arguments around potential licensing markets
Injunctions for HandsFree Labs and Align Technology come as the Court of Appeal warns that busy teams must have the staffing and resources to meet UPC deadlines
Gift this article