Supreme People’s Court suspends Castel damage award

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Supreme People’s Court suspends Castel damage award

The French wine maker, which had been found liable for infringing the mark of a Chinese winemaker, has received a temporary stay of the damage award handed out by the Zhejiang Higher People’s Court

Castel had been ordered to pay RMB33.73 million ($5.5 million) in damages to a wine importer who held the registration to a popular Chinese transliteration of its brand, Ka-Si-Te (卡斯特).

Castel appealed the decision to the Supreme People’s Court. According to Decanter.com, the court granted the stay after it found that the Zhejiang Higher People’s Court applied the law incorrectly.

The Supreme People’s Court’s decision is expected later this year.

Shanghai-based wine importer Panati and its subsidiary Cavesmaitre registered the Ka-Si-Te mark in 1998, which was approved in 2000. Castel started distributing its wine in China in 1999 using the Ka-Si-Te mark. Though it had registered the Latin alphabet “Castel” mark, it did not attempt do so for Ka-Si-Te.

In 2005, Castel initiated cancellation proceedings against Cavesmaitre for the Chinese mark on grounds of non-use. Cavesmaitre then counterclaimed for trade mark infringement, prevailing before the Zhejiang Intermediate People’s Court and then again on appeal to the provincial Higher People’s Court.

For Managing IP’s coverage and analysis of the case, click here.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Partner Rob Jacob unveils plans to offer a beginning-to-end trademark service, how to make prosecution profitable, and why IP ‘buy-in’ from the CEO stands the firm in good stead
Sponsored by CAS
CAS provides practical pointers on how intellectual property and R&D teams can work in tandem to unlock tangible benefits and avoid wasted spend
Sponsored by CAS
CAS explores how AI is transforming intellectual property, from inventorship and copyright disputes to new demands on patent attorneys
Sponsored by That.Legal
Gillian Tan of That.Legal discusses a recent decision by the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore and what it reveals about the evidential burden in bad-faith trademark claims
Attorneys at Di Blasi, Parente & Associados share how the protection of trade secrets strengthens innovation by bringing together legal practice, regulatory developments, and established international references
Jin Ooi, who joins as a partner today, said he is excited to offer a ‘rounded’ IP service as the firm deepens its litigation expertise in the UK and Europe
As generics celebrate, practitioners believe innovator companies should brace for an ‘uphill battle’ when trying to prove induced infringement
A team from Cooley shares how they overturned a massive damages award by emphasising that the opposing company’s trade secrets claims were time-barred
Sponsored by Licks Attorneys
Eduardo Hallak, Rafaella Oliveira, and Laís Souza of Licks Attorneys explain how the provision operates in practice, highlighting evidential hurdles and best practices for patent applicants
Sponsored by Liu, Shen & Associates
Chunyu Cui and Ziqing Wu of Liu, Shen & Associates say recent trends in China’s intellectual property courts indicate alignment with international standards and send a clear signal to the global market
Gift this article