Supreme People’s Court suspends Castel damage award

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Supreme People’s Court suspends Castel damage award

The French wine maker, which had been found liable for infringing the mark of a Chinese winemaker, has received a temporary stay of the damage award handed out by the Zhejiang Higher People’s Court

Castel had been ordered to pay RMB33.73 million ($5.5 million) in damages to a wine importer who held the registration to a popular Chinese transliteration of its brand, Ka-Si-Te (卡斯特).

Castel appealed the decision to the Supreme People’s Court. According to Decanter.com, the court granted the stay after it found that the Zhejiang Higher People’s Court applied the law incorrectly.

The Supreme People’s Court’s decision is expected later this year.

Shanghai-based wine importer Panati and its subsidiary Cavesmaitre registered the Ka-Si-Te mark in 1998, which was approved in 2000. Castel started distributing its wine in China in 1999 using the Ka-Si-Te mark. Though it had registered the Latin alphabet “Castel” mark, it did not attempt do so for Ka-Si-Te.

In 2005, Castel initiated cancellation proceedings against Cavesmaitre for the Chinese mark on grounds of non-use. Cavesmaitre then counterclaimed for trade mark infringement, prevailing before the Zhejiang Intermediate People’s Court and then again on appeal to the provincial Higher People’s Court.

For Managing IP’s coverage and analysis of the case, click here.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Cabinet M Oproiu’s Raluca Vasilescu explains why AI is changing what clients expect from patent attorneys, where the technology is overhyped and what the next generation will need to do differently
As clients demand more flexible fees and AI-driven efficiencies, IP firms are rethinking pricing without abandoning the value of their work
HG Law was formed largely by ex Fish & Neave lawyers who left after the latter's merger with Ropes & Gray; now those experiences are shaping its latest combination
David Rodrigues and Evan Lazerowitz – attorneys at Robinson & Cole – offer practical guidance on the steps a business might consider to preserve and maximise IP value before entering financial distress or insolvency
Daniel Law CEO Alicia Daniel-Shores may have stepped into a family business, but she has spent two decades building her own vision around technology and litigation
Law firms don't particularly like saying no to clients. Perhaps they should get better at it
The office, which has a relatively new patent litigation team as well as a wider ‘soft’ IP offering, would remain independent if the rejection is rubberstamped
The IP boutique is betting that growing investment in quantum and semiconductors will fuel demand as technology shifts toward physical systems
Lawyers say the overhaul better reflects commercial reality, with changes spanning novelty searches, digital designs and access to a small claims track, but stopping short of criminalising unregistered design infringement
Carpmaels & Ransford hires its fourth partner of the year and wins access to UPC files, as fresh orders address costs, confidentiality and the use of divisional patents
Gift this article