Do you want fast-track trade mark examination?

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Do you want fast-track trade mark examination?

The UK IPO is again asking users whether they would make use of fast-track trade mark examination

Speedy filing, on payment of a higher fee, was one of the recommendations made by the Gowers Review in 2006. Following a consultation, it was introduced in the UK in 2008.

But take up was low, and the standard procedure became quicker, leading to the service being suspended in 2009.

In 2012, then IP minister Lord Marland proposed reintroducing the fast track. Since then, standard examining times have continued to fall.

The IPO says that now is “an appropriate time to consult on the need, and demand, for the reintroduction of the service”.

A PDF document sets out the full details of the consultation, including specific questions regarding use of the fast-track procedure. These include: Would you make use of a fast track procedure at 5 days for £300? And What would you consider to be an optimum period for receiving the first examination report?

Responses from any interested party can be sent to the IPO by email.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Partner Rob Jacob unveils plans to offer a beginning-to-end trademark service, how to make prosecution profitable, and why IP ‘buy-in’ from the CEO stands the firm in good stead
Sponsored by CAS
CAS provides practical pointers on how intellectual property and R&D teams can work in tandem to unlock tangible benefits and avoid wasted spend
Sponsored by CAS
CAS explores how AI is transforming intellectual property, from inventorship and copyright disputes to new demands on patent attorneys
Sponsored by That.Legal
Gillian Tan of That.Legal discusses a recent decision by the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore and what it reveals about the evidential burden in bad-faith trademark claims
Attorneys at Di Blasi, Parente & Associados share how the protection of trade secrets strengthens innovation by bringing together legal practice, regulatory developments, and established international references
Jin Ooi, who joins as a partner today, said he is excited to offer a ‘rounded’ IP service as the firm deepens its litigation expertise in the UK and Europe
As generics celebrate, practitioners believe innovator companies should brace for an ‘uphill battle’ when trying to prove induced infringement
A team from Cooley shares how they overturned a massive damages award by emphasising that the opposing company’s trade secrets claims were time-barred
Sponsored by Licks Attorneys
Eduardo Hallak, Rafaella Oliveira, and Laís Souza of Licks Attorneys explain how the provision operates in practice, highlighting evidential hurdles and best practices for patent applicants
Sponsored by Liu, Shen & Associates
Chunyu Cui and Ziqing Wu of Liu, Shen & Associates say recent trends in China’s intellectual property courts indicate alignment with international standards and send a clear signal to the global market
Gift this article