Do you want fast-track trade mark examination?

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Do you want fast-track trade mark examination?

The UK IPO is again asking users whether they would make use of fast-track trade mark examination

Speedy filing, on payment of a higher fee, was one of the recommendations made by the Gowers Review in 2006. Following a consultation, it was introduced in the UK in 2008.

But take up was low, and the standard procedure became quicker, leading to the service being suspended in 2009.

In 2012, then IP minister Lord Marland proposed reintroducing the fast track. Since then, standard examining times have continued to fall.

The IPO says that now is “an appropriate time to consult on the need, and demand, for the reintroduction of the service”.

A PDF document sets out the full details of the consultation, including specific questions regarding use of the fast-track procedure. These include: Would you make use of a fast track procedure at 5 days for £300? And What would you consider to be an optimum period for receiving the first examination report?

Responses from any interested party can be sent to the IPO by email.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Loke Khoon Tan and Stephanie Yip at Dentons explain what brand owners need to know ahead of January 1 2027, when updates to China’s Trade Mark Law come into force
New US bills signal that firms should work with clients to ensure they are complying with potential regulatory requirements
Octavio Espejo of Becerril, Coca & Becerril explains how sweeping patent reforms reshape filing strategies, prosecution, and divisional application practice
The UK Supreme Court’s decision in Tesla v Avanci enhances the UK's attractiveness for global FRAND battles, say lawyers at Simmons & Simmons
PE-backed practices now comprise the majority of ranked firms for patent prosecution in the Netherlands, but competitors are confident about their decision to remain independent
The firm says new additions position Brown Rudnick as a market leader in tech, life sciences, and global litigation
Richard Quatrano, counsel at Olshan Frome Wolosky, shares why technology M&A buyers and sellers must verify written IP assignments, as broken ownership chains can undermine valuation, deal terms, and closing certainty
Appointment of AI and copyright expert Anna Naydonov, as well as another partner from Orrick, shows how firms can attract top litigators through leveraging the power of their existing teams
K&L Gates and Baker Botts have recruited leading patent practitioners from Wende IP and EIP, respectively, as they seek to strengthen European patent litigation capabilities
The departure of a large chunk of Spruson & Ferguson's legacy leadership could have destabilised the firm, but it's fighting back with strategic hires and promotions
Gift this article