Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Is Weatherley's world too black and white?

Last week saw the publication of a report on copyright education (and the need for more of it) by the UK prime minister's IP adviser. But is its good guys/bad guys approach too simplistic?


The report by Mike Weatherley MP (pictured right, centre) was the third (and final, since he will leave Parliament in 2015) he has prepared for David Cameron.

Despite being appointed to the (upaid) role of intellectual property adviser, each report has focused on copyright. That is not surprising, since it is an area of IP the former music industry executive knows very well. But has the insight he has gained as an industry insider made him too willing to defend industry practices from the challenges unleashed by the digital revolution?

In a piece Weatherley wrote last week for Conservative Party blog Conservative Home, the IP adviser talked about a recent visit he had paid to a university. While there, he had asked the students present how many had illegally downloaded music in the past month. Around 90% admitted they had.

Weatherley then asked how many of these people "thought that they were helping to contribute to the downfall of our creative industries" - a loaded question if ever there was one. One third of the students kept their hands raised.

Weatherley concluded from this experiment (which he acknowledges was not very scientific) that "(a) that third just didn't care about the consequences, and that (b) the other two-thirds hadn't thought through the consequences".

But this surely amounts to what academics would call a false dichotomy. There may be another explanation: some students may have thought that they were supporting the band and the industry that goes with it. They may have known that the money they subsequently spent on tickets to see the band live, or for a T shirt, or for the entire album that they bought after hearing one track, would contribute towards the upkeep of the creative industries.

Of course it is important to acknowledge the positive impact that IP has for developed economies, and the disruption that the internet has caused the creative industries (not least publishing). But it is seems worth acknowledging that the young people who cut their technological and creative teeth making mashups and parodying successful artists, or who can now access more forms of music than they could ever afford to buy, might yet be the next generation's world-leading artists.

Weatherly has agreed to an interview with Managing IP before he leaves office, so we look forward to discussing these questions with him.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

IP counsel urge the government to restrict safe harbour exceptions available to intermediaries and clear up doubts with the existing law
A New York lawyer could face sanctions after citing fake judgments generated by ChatGPT, but that doesn’t mean practitioners should shy away from AI
Klaus Grabinski told delegates at a UPC inauguration event that the proposed SEP regulation would limit access to justice
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis coverage from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Sukanya Sarkar shares her thoughts on this year’s annual meeting in Singapore, where debates ranged from AI opportunities to improving law firm culture
The court’s ruling is a good reminder that US parties aren’t guaranteed attorney fees just because they win, say sources
With business confidence in a shaky state, Rachel Tan and Lisa Yong of Rouse discuss how in-house IP teams can manage their trademark portfolios through uncertain times
The Court of Appeal had stern words for Med-El’s representatives after they highlighted a deputy judge’s background as a solicitor
Funders and NPEs say asserting patent portfolios can minimise risk at the USPTO’s PTAB, where procedure remains a controversial topic
The US Supreme Court’s ruling wasn’t a surprise and reflects a trend that had already been bubbling away for a while, say tech and pharma counsel