India goes “scientific” to improve Registry

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

India goes “scientific” to improve Registry

An overhaul of the Indian Trade Marks Registry has brought about considerable improvements to the quality of its services. Thanks to streamlined procedures and increased digitalization, the Trade Marks Registry has been able to reduce pendency times and increase responsiveness in the office.

r.jpg

According to Ram Awtar Tiwari ­(pictured) of the Trade Marks Registry, this came in large part from a push from the top to improve service. “After 2009, our leaders concentrated on reorganizing the trademark registry,” he told the INTA Daily News. “Now, it has been completely implemented.”

The Madrid Protocol has played a major role in this improvement. In preparation for India’s accession to the Protocol, the Trade Marks Registry implemented a full-service e-filing system. In fact, Tiwari explained that Madrid applications in India may only be filed online, and that oppositions must also be filed digitally.

Increased automation, especially of routine tasks, is also helping. For example, oppositions filed online are logged immediately with the Registrar, while those filed by paper often take about a week to be logged. These changes have helped to reduce pendency time; in 2012-2013, the Trade Mark Registry actually examined more applications than it received, which should help address the backlog. Tiwari says that there are more improvements to come, and that the office is taking a “scientific” approach to improving its procedures.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

IP lawyers at three firms reflect on how courts across Australia have reacted to AI use in litigation, and explain why they support measured use of the technology
AJ Park’s owner, IPH, announced earlier this week that Steve Mitchell will take the reins of the New Zealand-based firm in January
Chris Adamson and Milli Bouri of Adamson & Partners join us to discuss IP market trends and what law firm and in-house clients are looking for
Noemi Parrotta, chair of the European subcommittee within INTA's International Amicus Committee, explains why the General Court’s decision in the Iceland case could make it impossible to protect country names as trademarks
Inès Garlantezec, who became principal of the firm’s Luxembourg office earlier this year, discusses what's been keeping her busy, including settling a long-running case
In the sixth episode of a podcast series celebrating the tenth anniversary of IP Inclusive, we discuss IP Futures, a network for early-career stage IP professionals
Rachel Cohen has reunited with her former colleagues to strengthen Weil’s IP litigation and strategy work
McKool Smith’s Jennifer Truelove explains how a joint effort between her firm and Irell & Manella secured a win for their client against Samsung
Tilleke & Gibbins topped the leaderboard with four awards across the region, while Anand & Anand and Kim & Chang emerged as outstanding domestic firms
News of a new addition to Via LA’s Qi wireless charging patent pool, and potential fee increases at the UKIPO were also among the top talking points
Gift this article