WTO panel to issue tobacco plain packaging report by November
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

WTO panel to issue tobacco plain packaging report by November

A dispute at the WTO over Australia’s rules on plain packaging for tobacco products is set to be the trade organisation’s biggest

More countries have asked to be third parties in the proceedings than in the long-running banana war between the EU and a number of Latin American countries.

WTO Director-General Roberto Azevêdo this week appointed three panellists to consider the plain packaging issue after the six countries at the centre of the row – Australia, Ukraine, Indonesia, Cuba, Dominican Republic and Honduras – failed to agree who should examine the disputes.

The panel will be chaired by Alexander Erwin of South Africa. The other two members are François Dessemonted of Switzerland and Billie Miller of Barbados. The parties will make written and oral representations to the panel, which must finalise its report within six months.

The panellists will decide whether they think Australia’s tobacco plain packaging laws breach the trade organisation’s rules before the end of the year.

Five panels have been established to consider the complaints made by five countries about Australia’s decision to force tobacco companies to sell their products in so-called plain packaging. The same three panellists will head each panel after the parties agreed to a harmonised procedure.

Although each of the complaints target Australia’s plain packaging rules, they are not exactly the same. Ukraine’s deals with “certain measures concerning trademarks and other plain packaging requirements applicable to tobacco products and packaging” while the rest also invoke the WTO’s rules on geographical indications.

The appointments come shortly after Australia complained that the unresolved trade row was having a chilling effect on other countries that are considering introducing similar constraints on the way that tobacco is packaged. Ukraine requested consultations with Australia under WTO procedures more than two years ago.

New Zealand has already said that it plans to follow Australia’s lead, and the UK government said last month it will introduce plain packaging following a review.

If the panel decides that plain packaging does breach WTO trade rules, it recommends how the measure should be changed. Its report becomes the Dispute Settlement Body’s ruling or recommendation within 60 days unless a consensus rejects it. If one or more party appeals, the appeal is heard by three members of the WTO’s permanent seven-member Appellate Body. It has up to 90 days to uphold, modify or reverse the panel’s legal findings and conclusions. The Dispute Settlement Body has to accept or reject the appeals report within 30 days — and rejection is only possible by consensus.

You can read an article by lawyers from Bird & Bird and Truman Hoyle on plain packaging in the latest issue of Managing IP.





more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

With a team of more than 80 patent lawyers and attorneys across 21 European offices, the firm is acting in some of the most high-profile UPC cases
Lippes Mathias has hired three partners and a counsel from Offit Kurman
External counsel for automotive companies explain how trends such as AI and vehicle connectivity are affecting their practices and reveal what their clients are prioritising
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis coverage from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
The winners of the awards will be revealed at a gala dinner in New York City on April 25
Counsel debate the potential outcome of SCOTUS’s latest copyright case after justices questioned whether they should dismiss it
Each week Managing IP speaks to a different IP lawyer about their life and career
The small Düsseldorf firm is making a big impact in the UPC. Founding partner Christof Augenstein explains why
The court criticised Oppo’s attempts to delay proceedings and imposed a penalty, adding that the Chinese company may need to pay more if the trial isn’t concluded this year
Miguel Hernandez explains how he secured victory for baby care company Naterra in his first oral argument before the Federal Circuit
Gift this article