EU mulls expansion of GI scheme

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

EU mulls expansion of GI scheme

Makers of Parma ham and Champagne already enjoy EU-wide geographical indication protection. Now the European Commission is considering whether to expand that protection to products such as Scottish tartans and Italian marble

Officials this week launched a green paper setting out why the Commission wants more products to fall within the EU’s GI scheme.

Michel Barnier, Commissioner for Internal Market and Services said: “The European Union is rich in products based on traditional knowledge and production methods, which are often rooted in the cultural and social heritage of a particular geographical location, from Bohemian crystal and Scottish tartans to Carrara marble to Tapisserie d’Aubusson.”

He added that protecting these kinds of goods with GIs could offer economic benefits to SMEs and boost Europe’s regions.

“This could help preserve our unique and diverse heritage, whilst making a significant contribution to European jobs and growth.”

At the moment, EU-wide GI protection is only available for agricultural products such as cheeses, wines, meats, and fruits and vegetables from a specific place that have certain qualities or which are made according to traditional methods. Non-agricultural products such as ceramics, marble, cutlery, shoes, tapestries, and musical instruments are not protected by GIs beyond national laws.

The Commission says that 14 EU member states have laws on GI protection for non-agricultural products. This lack of harmonisation means that non-agricultural producers who wish to protect a GI in the EU need to file for protection in each of those countries.

The EU’s consultation will be running until October 28.



more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The tie-up could result in the firm’s German and France-based teams, which both have strong UPC expertise, becoming independent
News of a slowdown in the UK’s clean energy IP landscape and an EPO report on unitary patent uptake were also among the top talking points
Price hikes at ‘big law’ firms are pushing some clients toward boutiques that offer predictable fees, specialised expertise, and a model built around prioritising IP
The Australian side, in particular, can benefit by capitalising on its independent status to bring in more work from Western countries while still working with its former Chinese partner
Koen Bijvank of Brinkhof and Johannes Heselberger of Bardehle Pagenberg discuss the Amgen v Sanofi case and why it will be cited frequently
View the official winners of the 2025 Social Impact EMEA Awards
King & Wood Mallesons will break into two entities, 14 years after a merger between a Chinese and an Australian firm created the combined outfit
Teams from Shakespeare Martineau and DWF will take centre stage in a dispute concerning the registrability of dairy terminology in plant-based products
Senem Kayahan, attorney and founder at PatentSe, discusses how she divides prosecution tasks, and reveals the importance of empathetic client advice
The association’s Australian group has filed a formal complaint against the choice of venue, citing Dubai as an unsafe environment for the LGBTQIA+ community
Gift this article