EU mulls expansion of GI scheme

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

EU mulls expansion of GI scheme

Makers of Parma ham and Champagne already enjoy EU-wide geographical indication protection. Now the European Commission is considering whether to expand that protection to products such as Scottish tartans and Italian marble

Officials this week launched a green paper setting out why the Commission wants more products to fall within the EU’s GI scheme.

Michel Barnier, Commissioner for Internal Market and Services said: “The European Union is rich in products based on traditional knowledge and production methods, which are often rooted in the cultural and social heritage of a particular geographical location, from Bohemian crystal and Scottish tartans to Carrara marble to Tapisserie d’Aubusson.”

He added that protecting these kinds of goods with GIs could offer economic benefits to SMEs and boost Europe’s regions.

“This could help preserve our unique and diverse heritage, whilst making a significant contribution to European jobs and growth.”

At the moment, EU-wide GI protection is only available for agricultural products such as cheeses, wines, meats, and fruits and vegetables from a specific place that have certain qualities or which are made according to traditional methods. Non-agricultural products such as ceramics, marble, cutlery, shoes, tapestries, and musical instruments are not protected by GIs beyond national laws.

The Commission says that 14 EU member states have laws on GI protection for non-agricultural products. This lack of harmonisation means that non-agricultural producers who wish to protect a GI in the EU need to file for protection in each of those countries.

The EU’s consultation will be running until October 28.



more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The UK-India trade deal doesn’t mention legal services, showing India has again failed to agree on a move that could help foreign firms and local practitioners
Eva-Maria Strobel reveals some of the firm’s IP achievements and its approach to client relationships
Lateral hires at Thompson Hine and Pierson Ferdinand said they were inspired by fresh business opportunities and innovative strategies at their new firms
The launch of a new IP insurance product and INTA hiring a former USPTO commissioner were also among the top talking points this week
The firm explains how it secured a $170.6 million verdict against the government in a patent dispute surrounding airport technology, and why the case led to interest from other inventors
Developments of note included the court partially allowing a claim concerning confidentiality clubs and a decision involving technology used in football matches
The firm said adding capability in the French capital completes its coverage of all major patent litigation jurisdictions as it strives for UPC excellence
Marc Fenster explains how keeping the jury focused on the most relevant facts helped secure a $279m win for his client against Samsung
Clients are divided on what externally funded IP firms bring to the table, so those firms must prove why the benefits outweigh the downsides
Rahul Bhartiya, AI coordinator at the EUIPO, discusses the office’s strategy, collaboration with other IP offices, and getting rid of routine tasks
Gift this article