Golden Balls case sent back to OHIM

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Golden Balls case sent back to OHIM

The Court of Justice of the EU has referred a seven-year long dispute over the Golden Balls trade mark back to the OHIM for reassessment

Golden Balls

The case started in 2007 when Gus and Inez Bodurs filed a CTM application for Golden Balls in classes 9, 28 and 41. Intra-Presse opposed the application based on its earlier mark Ballon d’Or.

The opposition division backed the Bodurs, finding there was no likelihood of confusion, but the OHIM First Board of Appeal overturned that finding as far as most of the goods and services were concerned.

However, the Board did not consider Intra-Presse’s argument about the reputation of its earlier mark under Article 8(5) of the CTM Regulation.

In 2013 the EU General Court reversed the Board of Appeal, finding in favour of the Bodurs in two related cases.

Those decisions have now been partially set aside by the CJEU, which criticised the General Court for not carrying out an overall assessment of the marks despite “the low degree of similarity between them”.

The Court also said that the Board of Appeal should rule “on each of the heads of claim submitted for its consideration” (including concerning reputation).

The parties were all ordered to pay their own costs.

Read the CJEU judgment dated November 20.

There is more analysis on the IP Kat blog, which has been a supporter of the Bodurs, and on Field Fisher’s IP blog.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

A report that revealed top legal LinkedIn influencers are generating hundreds of thousands in advertising value is the push lawyers need to up their social media presence
Speakers at the EUIPO’s Mediation Conference say mediation can offer a ‘cathartic’ and effective alternative to litigation that IP owners should consider
Partner Scott Sudderth says he is looking forward to building strong client relationships and expanding the firm’s patent practice
Find out which firms secured the most nominations for Managing IP’s Asia-Pacific Awards 2025, ahead of the winners being revealed on November 6
Raluca Vasilescu joins our ‘Five minutes with’ series to discuss patent mining and watercolour painting
Jan Phillip Rektorschek, founding partner at Pentarc in Germany, explains why the firm broke away from Taylor Wessing and discusses its plans for staying competitive
Royal Mail Group wins copyright and database right infringement case, in a dispute that can be linked to the history of postcodes in the UK
Managing partner Mark O’Donnell explains why people are at the centre of the Australian outfit’s investment focus and how being independent benefits the firm
IP is becoming one of the most significant drivers of major deals, and law firms are altering their practices to reflect the change
In the second in a new podcast series celebrating the tenth anniversary of IP Inclusive, we discuss IPause, a network set up to support those experiencing (peri)menopause
Gift this article