Golden Balls case sent back to OHIM

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Golden Balls case sent back to OHIM

The Court of Justice of the EU has referred a seven-year long dispute over the Golden Balls trade mark back to the OHIM for reassessment

Golden Balls

The case started in 2007 when Gus and Inez Bodurs filed a CTM application for Golden Balls in classes 9, 28 and 41. Intra-Presse opposed the application based on its earlier mark Ballon d’Or.

The opposition division backed the Bodurs, finding there was no likelihood of confusion, but the OHIM First Board of Appeal overturned that finding as far as most of the goods and services were concerned.

However, the Board did not consider Intra-Presse’s argument about the reputation of its earlier mark under Article 8(5) of the CTM Regulation.

In 2013 the EU General Court reversed the Board of Appeal, finding in favour of the Bodurs in two related cases.

Those decisions have now been partially set aside by the CJEU, which criticised the General Court for not carrying out an overall assessment of the marks despite “the low degree of similarity between them”.

The Court also said that the Board of Appeal should rule “on each of the heads of claim submitted for its consideration” (including concerning reputation).

The parties were all ordered to pay their own costs.

Read the CJEU judgment dated November 20.

There is more analysis on the IP Kat blog, which has been a supporter of the Bodurs, and on Field Fisher’s IP blog.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The UK-India trade deal doesn’t mention legal services, showing India has again failed to agree on a move that could help foreign firms and local practitioners
Eva-Maria Strobel reveals some of the firm’s IP achievements and its approach to client relationships
Lateral hires at Thompson Hine and Pierson Ferdinand said they were inspired by fresh business opportunities and innovative strategies at their new firms
The launch of a new IP insurance product and INTA hiring a former USPTO commissioner were also among the top talking points this week
The firm explains how it secured a $170.6 million verdict against the government in a patent dispute surrounding airport technology, and why the case led to interest from other inventors
Developments of note included the court partially allowing a claim concerning confidentiality clubs and a decision involving technology used in football matches
The firm said adding capability in the French capital completes its coverage of all major patent litigation jurisdictions as it strives for UPC excellence
Marc Fenster explains how keeping the jury focused on the most relevant facts helped secure a $279m win for his client against Samsung
Clients are divided on what externally funded IP firms bring to the table, so those firms must prove why the benefits outweigh the downsides
Rahul Bhartiya, AI coordinator at the EUIPO, discusses the office’s strategy, collaboration with other IP offices, and getting rid of routine tasks
Gift this article