Singapore’s new patent system ready to go

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Singapore’s new patent system ready to go

Singapore’s revamp of its patent system is set to take effect on February 14. Hong Kong, its closest competitor, is looking to follow suit

In July 2012, the Parliament amended the city-state’s patent laws to change the system to a positive grant regime.

Singapore currently grants patents under a self-assessment system which allows a patent to be granted even if an examination found that the invention would not be patentable for reasons such as lack of obviousness or lack of an inventive step.

There was concern that the self-assessment system encouraged the filing of low quality patents. As Kristian Robinson of Spruson & Ferguson explained, under the self-assessment system, an applicant could technically get a patent on a wheel.

Starting February 14, applications with a negative examination report will not result in a granted patent. In support of this change, the IP Office of Singapore also built an in-house examination department. Previously, examinations were outsourced to the Austrian, Danish and Hungarian patent offices.

Click here for Managing IP’s analysis of the changes.

Part of a larger plan

The change to a positive grant system is one part of Singapore’s plans to be a hub for IP services in the region. Hong Kong, the city Singapore is most often compared to, is similarly positioning itself as an IP marketplace. Last year, Hong Kong announced that it will reform its laws and start granting patents based on its own examination system while retaining its current recordal system. The Hong Kong plan is still in its initial stages, but several sources say that the IP Department has arranged for SIPO to provide examination capacity while Hong Kong’s system is being built.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Amongst a sea of mergers, Lathrop GPM and HG Law have set out plans to combine, positioning themselves to compete with both IP boutiques and full-service firms
Patrícia Paias explains why she loves the science and business behind an idea and why potential rights owners must avoid the ‘file and forget’ philosophy
Lawyers eagerly await news of what IP specialist Sir Colin Birss will bring to one of the England and Wales judiciary’s most important roles
María Aurora García of Berken IP explains how intellectual property rights holders can use customs monitoring and online enforcement tools to identify parallel imports and support compliance with consumer protection rules
The Jakarta-based firm says personal networks and a distinctive strategy can help it guide foreign clients through what can be a tricky IP landscape
Munich litigation boutique formed by former Taylor Wessing partners continues expansion as it seeks to cement its position in the UPC market
Yvonne Tang and Siau Wen Lim, the second and third IP specialists to sit on the firm’s management committee, say IP is ‘uniquely positioned’ to support cross-practice work
As competing firms come under common ownership, clients may care less about formal conflicts and more about how openly firms discuss them
Facing increased lateral movement and in-house competition, firms are investing in flexible billing hours and tailored career progression to improve associate retention
As the US reflects on 250 years of independence, patent lawyers say innovation is reshaping old hiring priorities, with firms seeking broader IP expertise over specialisation
Gift this article