Where does the Inventor Trail end?
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Where does the Inventor Trail end?

The European Commission has a new approach to policy making in the IP area. In fact, to call it an approach to IP would be to fall into the silo trap that the Commission says it is trying to escape. The Commission’s approach is far more rounded


The IP team within DG Internal Market is touting its model of the Inventor Trail – a roadmap designed to focus policy makers’ minds on helping companies develop their innovative businesses in a conception-to-export way.

Kerstin Jorna, head of the IP team within DG Internal Market, says the Inventor Trail is not a “disruption but an evolution” in the Commission’s way of thinking, designed to remind policy makers that all rules have a purpose.

“IP is not a purpose in itself. It is a tool for jobs and growth,” she told Managing IP.

The Commission needs to be congratulated for putting IP in the bigger commercial picture. As Jorna says, the goal of the single market is to raise levels of growth in the EU. The Commission’s commitment to evidence-based policy making is also to be welcomed: Jorna says she wants to beef up the Commission’s own expertise in the area of IP economics, as well as facilitating a new network of IP economists across the EU to share information and approaches.

But the Commission needs to ensure that it takes IP users, as well as IP owners, along the Inventor Trail too. Of course in many cases their interests will be the same, and Jorna was clear about the advantages that new rules on collecting societies and pan-EU licensing will have for consumers who want to access cultural material online.

In areas such as free trade deals, Jorna says that the Commission needs to consider the Inventor Trail and ensure that the IP chapter “makes sense” for companies on both sides. But should the goal of IP policy making always be to facilitate corporate growth – or does that lead to an ACTA-style backlash. Let us know.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Partners at Quinn Emanuel explain how walkie-talkie and real-estate analogies helped them win over a jury at the Eastern District of Texas
The heads of Malaysian firm HHQ’s new technology practice group say they can be frontline advisers on the intersection between AI, blockchain, and IP
Darren Jiron, Finnegan’s managing partner in London, discusses the firm’s growth plans and misconceptions about US firm culture
The EMEA region research cycle has commenced - do not miss this opportunity to nominate your work from 2023!
A former partner at Stroock & Stroock & Lavan, which voted to dissolve in October, has joined McCarter & English
As ChatGPT celebrates its first birthday, we are still grappling with a multitude of IP concerns
Sources say an official role at an IP industry body is great for generating business leads, but that shouldn’t be the only motivation behind taking on the responsibility
Breton is commissioner for the internal market in the EU at the European Commission
Kupecz is a judge at the UPC Central Division in Germany
Hakki is senior partner at Shearman & Sterling in the US and Dejonghe is senior partner at Allen & Overy in London