L’Oréal and eBay settle dispute over online fakes
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

L’Oréal and eBay settle dispute over online fakes

Seven years after L’Oréal sued eBay for not doing enough to counter the sale of fakes on its website, the two companies have settled their litigation, declaring that “cooperation, rather than litigation”, is the way forward in the fight against fakes

The terms of the deal are confidential but in a joint statement L’Oréal said it acknowledges eBay’s commitment in the fight against intellectual property infringement.

L’Oréal filed lawsuits against eBay in France, Belgium, the UK and Spain in 2007. In 2008 the Belgian first instance court dismissed L’Oréal’s claims. One year later, the Paris Tribunal de Grande Instance ruled that eBay had fulfilled its obligation “in good faith” to help prevent fake L’Oréal products from being sold on its website but the judge told the two parties to discuss their dispute with a mediator.

The case filed in the UK was ultimately referred to Europe’s highest court, which in 2011 addressed the liability of internet service providers for counterfeit goods sold online; the legality of sales of goods from outside the EU; and the legitimacy of keyword advertising.

The Court’s ruling said that the operator of an online marketplace cannot be exempted from liability for infringement when it “plays an active role” giving it knowledge of or control over data relating to offers for sale.

At the time, Stefan Krawczyk, senior director and counsel government relations, eBay Europe, told Managing IP that it is still up to the national courts to decide facts. “That still probably leaves 27 or more different interpretations,” he added. “The national court will again come into play: is it proportionate? Does it affect legitimate trade? Judgments will be made in national contexts.”

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

With a team of more than 80 patent lawyers and attorneys across 21 European offices, the firm is acting in some of the most high-profile UPC cases
Lippes Mathias has hired three partners and a counsel from Offit Kurman
External counsel for automotive companies explain how trends such as AI and vehicle connectivity are affecting their practices and reveal what their clients are prioritising
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis coverage from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
The winners of the awards will be revealed at a gala dinner in New York City on April 25
Counsel debate the potential outcome of SCOTUS’s latest copyright case after justices questioned whether they should dismiss it
Each week Managing IP speaks to a different IP lawyer about their life and career
The small Düsseldorf firm is making a big impact in the UPC. Founding partner Christof Augenstein explains why
The court criticised Oppo’s attempts to delay proceedings and imposed a penalty, adding that the Chinese company may need to pay more if the trial isn’t concluded this year
Miguel Hernandez explains how he secured victory for baby care company Naterra in his first oral argument before the Federal Circuit
Gift this article