Steiff loses bear button CTM case

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Steiff loses bear button CTM case

German toy maker Steiff has been told by the EU’s General Court that it cannot obtain a Community trade mark for the label it attaches to its teddy bears’ ears with a button

 

In a ruling delivered today, the Court said that the attachment of a button or a label to the ear of a soft toy is not distinctive because it does not allow average consumers in the EU to know that the toy was made by Steiff.

The German company applied to OHIM for a CTM for its positional mark in 2010 to protect the position of the button in the middle of the ears of the toys, rather than a particular type of label or button.

OHIM said that the mark was devoid of distinctive character and that Steiff could not enjoy an exclusive right to produce soft toys that have a rectangular fabric label attached to their ears by way of a metal button fixed to the ear.

Now the General Court of the Court of Justice of the EU has backed OHIM. It said that the “positional” marks cannot be separated from the overall appearance of the toys. It also ruled that consumers would regard the button and label as a decorative element (one of many possible designs of soft toys) rather than as an indication of commercial origin.

The Court added that it was irrelevant whether Steiff was the only manufacturer to attach a shiny or matt round metal button to the ears of soft toys or a rectangular fabric label in the middle of the ear of soft toys.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

News of InterDigital suing Amazon in the US and CMS IndusLaw challenging Indian rules on foreign firms were also among the top talking points
IP lawyers at three firms reflect on how courts across Australia have reacted to AI use in litigation, and explain why they support measured use of the technology
AJ Park’s owner, IPH, announced earlier this week that Steve Mitchell will take the reins of the New Zealand-based firm in January
Chris Adamson and Milli Bouri of Adamson & Partners join us to discuss IP market trends and what law firm and in-house clients are looking for
Noemi Parrotta, chair of the European subcommittee within INTA's International Amicus Committee, explains why the General Court’s decision in the Iceland case could make it impossible to protect country names as trademarks
Inès Garlantezec, who became principal of the firm’s Luxembourg office earlier this year, discusses what's been keeping her busy, including settling a long-running case
In the sixth episode of a podcast series celebrating the tenth anniversary of IP Inclusive, we discuss IP Futures, a network for early-career stage IP professionals
Rachel Cohen has reunited with her former colleagues to strengthen Weil’s IP litigation and strategy work
McKool Smith’s Jennifer Truelove explains how a joint effort between her firm and Irell & Manella secured a win for their client against Samsung
Tilleke & Gibbins topped the leaderboard with four awards across the region, while Anand & Anand and Kim & Chang emerged as outstanding domestic firms
Gift this article