Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Singapore proposes new website blocking system

The Ministry of Law is seeking comments on proposed amendments to the Copyright Law allowing rights holders to take judicial action against infringing websites

The bill, introduced earlier this week, would allow rights holders to apply for an order from the High Court to block access to sites deemed to be flagrantly infringing. Whether a site is a “flagrantly infringing online location” depends on several factors, including whether its primary purpose is to commit or facilitate infringement, whether the site contains directories or indexes of means to infringe on copyrighted material, whether the site has been blocked by other countries and whether the site owner demonstrates a general disregard for copyright.

In order to obtain a blocking order, the rights holder must also establish that the internet service provider knew of the infringing site. This requirement may be satisfied with a written notice to the ISP.

Similarly, the rights holder must serve a written notice to the operator of the targeted site, though the court may waive this requirement if it determines that the rights holder is unable to identify or locate the operator after reasonable attempts to do so.

Beyond the safe harbour

In the public consultation document, the Ministry of Law notes that rights holders can already request that an ISP remove access to infringing material under the safe harbour provisions. However, it said that the system is not effective because rights holders have found it too burdensome to sue ISPs who do not comply with such notices. The system in the proposed amendment, according to Ministry, is designed to be more efficient and avoids reliance on action by the ISP.

Comments on the proposed bill may be submitted to until April 21. The text of the proposed amendment can be found here.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Counsel from BMW and Finnegan explain how they got an NPE to sign a covenant agreeing not to sue the automaker ever again
The blue checkmark could be a good tool, but it’s unclear how widespread its adoption will be, say in-house sources
Sarah Harris, partner at Williams & Connolly, reveals how her team secured a copyright victory at SCOTUS and reflects on why the case matters
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis coverage from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
A Court of Appeal judge demanded respect for solicitor-judges after reprimanding a barrister for his 'unwise' words
Speeches at the UPC inauguration highlighted the gap between the unitary patent dream and the reality today
Sources with experience on both sides of the Atlantic believe hugely profitable US law firms may still take some convincing before agreeing to partner with a UK outfit
IP counsel urge the government to restrict safe harbour exceptions available to intermediaries and clear up doubts with the existing law
A New York lawyer could face sanctions after citing fake judgments generated by ChatGPT, but that doesn’t mean practitioners should shy away from AI
Klaus Grabinski told delegates at a UPC inauguration event that the proposed SEP regulation would limit access to justice