IP police offer advertisers list of infringing websites

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

IP police offer advertisers list of infringing websites

The IP crime unit within the City of London Police has created a list of copyright-infringing websites it wants online advertisers to avoid

It has launched the Infringing Website List (IWL) following a three-month pilot involvingmusic industry groups IFPI and BPI, the Federation Against Copyright Theft, the Publishers Association, and online advertising industry groups ISBA, IPA and IAB UK.

The initiative is designed to attack the revenue sources of the businesses behind infringing sites.

Andy Fyfe, head of the Police IP Crime Unit, said: “If an advert from an established brand appears on an infringing website not only does it lend the site a look of legitimacy, but inadvertently the brand and advertiser are funding online crime. Therefore the IWL also serves as a safety tool, ensuring the reputation of advertisers and brands are not discredited through association with illegal websites.”

The Unit says that the list of websites is an online portal of sites identified by the creative industries and verified by the police that can be used by advertisers and agencies when they are deciding where to place their adverts.

The IWL was today the subject of a freedom of information request, with the police asked to reveal which websites have so far been removed from the List, as result of, for example, compliance with copyright laws.

The European Commission is trying to encourage brand owners and advertisers to develop a similar EU-wide list. In an interview with Managing IP, Kerstin Jorna, head of the IP team within DG Internal Market, said she wanted her officials to tackle the business models used by copyright infringers.

“In 2014 we want to follow the money,” she said.

But not all brand owners have been quick to support the Commission’s plans for an MOU to create what would effectively be a blacklist of IP-infringing sites. The Commission says that while some gave it a positive reaction at the November meeting, others had either questioned the importance of the problem for them in particular or had been unaware of the problem.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

VO, which has offices in the Netherlands, Belgium and Germany, is the second European IP firm to secure external backing this week
The Bardehle Pagenberg attorneys-at-law discuss the firm’s Managing IP EMEA Awards 2026 success, Unified Patent Court litigation strategy, and evolving European patent trends
A patent battle between two legal tech companies and a loss for Elon Musk’s xAI against OpenAI were also among the top talking points
With drug prices a hot topic in the US, courts are seemingly more reluctant to prevent the entry of generics to the market
Academic Eden Sarid joins us during Pride Month to discuss queer expression and IP law, Patagonia v Pattie Gonia, and how queer and AI-generated creations both pose novelty concerns
Patent attorney Michael Henson joins the firm to lead its freshly launched blockchain and digital assets practice
A dispute over mammogram technology, and a development in the case between GSK and Moderna were also among the top talking points in recent weeks
With rankings for Western Europe set to be published on June 25, we sat down with our research lead to find out what practitioners and law firms can expect
Peter O’Sullivan, a professional services executive, says he is looking forward to helping Pearce IP become the leading life sciences firm in Australia and New Zealand
Matteo Di Lernia, advocate at LCA Studio Legale, unpicks the CJEU’s ruling in M.M. Ristorazione v Villa Ramazzini, including its impact on litigation strategies
Gift this article