Hansen slams “culture of public domain”

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Hansen slams “culture of public domain”

Hugh Hansen used the annual Sir Hugh Laddie memorial lecture at University College London this week to attack academics who would limit copyright

Hugh Hansen

The Fordham Law School professor addressed the topic “Is the culture of the public domain a good idea?” and gave an immediate answer (see photo right) in the speech on Wednesday evening.

He said the culture of the public domain, as proposed by professors such as Larry Lessig, was “spreading like a virus” in United States academia, and was likely to reach other countries. It was inspired by digital technology, and privileged users and derivative creators at the expense of original creators, said Hansen.

He added that it has undue influence in US copyright cases, for example in the Second Circuit, thanks to the role played by law clerks, who have often been taught by copyright atheists or agnostics.

Referring to the evolution of US copyright law since the Constitution's ratification, Hansen noted that 12 out of the 13 colonies already had copyright protection in 1787.

He stressed that the philosophy of copyright was not about providing a balance but providing and exclusive right. It was also not specifically about incentivising creation.

Instead, said Hansen, copyright was intended to be a property right and was a natural right in many state laws.

He also criticised the public domain, saying it was a drag on new artists and commercial works and did not benefit consumers: “It produces derivative works, self-absorption, instant gratification, a culture where taking something created by someone else is good. It is a bad moral lesson.”

But he acknowledged that “copyright owners are part of the problem” as they are bad at making arguments and debating on social media. Specifically, he criticised attempts to seek royalties for mobile-phone ringtones and also accused the Authors Guild of “destroying copyright” in its legal battle with Google Books.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Attorneys explain why there are early signs that the US Supreme Court could rule in favour of ISP Cox in a copyright dispute
A swathe of UPC-related hires suggests firms are taking the forum seriously, as questions over the transitional stage begin
A win for Nintendo in China and King & Spalding hiring a prominent patent litigator were also among the top talking points
Rebecca Newman at Addleshaw Goddard, who live-reported on the seminal dispute, unpicks the trials and tribulations of the case and considers its impact
Attorneys predict how Lululemon’s trade dress and design patent suit against Costco could play out
Lawyers at Linklaters analyse some of the key UPC trends so far, and look ahead to life beyond the transition period
David Rodrigues, who previously worked at an IP boutique, said he may become more involved in transactional work at his new firm
Indian smartphone maker Lava must pay $2.3 million as a security deposit for past sales, as its dispute with Dolby over audio coding SEPs plays out
Powell Gilbert’s opening in Düsseldorf, complete with a new partner hire, continues this summer’s trend of UPC-related lateral movement
IP leaders at Brandsmiths and Bird & Bird, who were on opposing sides at the UK Supreme Court in Iconix v Dream Pairs, unpick the landmark case and its ramifications
Gift this article