CJEU adviser clarifies rules on ISP injunctions

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

CJEU adviser clarifies rules on ISP injunctions

The legal adviser to the Court of Justice of the EU has advised it to clarify that national courts can order internet service providers to block access to websites that infringe copyright

Advocate General Pedro Cruz Villalón said that ISPs that provide internet access to infringing sites can be regarded as intermediaries under the Copyright Directive, and can therefore be the subject of an injunction.

But Cruz Villalón said that any injunction must refer to specific blocking measures and balance the interests of the parties. It would be incompatible with the weighing of those rights, for example, ban an ISP generally and without ordering specific measures from allowing its customers to access a particular website that infringes copyright. He added that rightholders must, where possible, claim directly against the operators of the illegal website or their providers.

The Advocate General’s opinion relates to a dispute between copyright owner Constantin Film Verleih and Wega Filmproduktionsgesellschaft and Austrian internet provider UPC Telekabel Wien. Constantin Film had asked the Austrian courts to injunct UPC from allowing its customers to access kino.to, a website that allows users to access movies posted without the copyright owners’ consent.

The Austrian Supreme Court has asked the CJEU to rule whether UPC can be regarded as an intermediary in this case, and to clarify how it should issue an injunction, if it is permitted to do so.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Attorneys explain why there are early signs that the US Supreme Court could rule in favour of ISP Cox in a copyright dispute
A swathe of UPC-related hires suggests firms are taking the forum seriously, as questions over the transitional stage begin
A win for Nintendo in China and King & Spalding hiring a prominent patent litigator were also among the top talking points
Rebecca Newman at Addleshaw Goddard, who live-reported on the seminal dispute, unpicks the trials and tribulations of the case and considers its impact
Attorneys predict how Lululemon’s trade dress and design patent suit against Costco could play out
Lawyers at Linklaters analyse some of the key UPC trends so far, and look ahead to life beyond the transition period
David Rodrigues, who previously worked at an IP boutique, said he may become more involved in transactional work at his new firm
Indian smartphone maker Lava must pay $2.3 million as a security deposit for past sales, as its dispute with Dolby over audio coding SEPs plays out
Powell Gilbert’s opening in Düsseldorf, complete with a new partner hire, continues this summer’s trend of UPC-related lateral movement
IP leaders at Brandsmiths and Bird & Bird, who were on opposing sides at the UK Supreme Court in Iconix v Dream Pairs, unpick the landmark case and its ramifications
Gift this article