Role play explains the pitfalls of social media

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Role play explains the pitfalls of social media

"And, action!" declared Lisa Iverson of Neal & McDevitt, as she kicked off an INTA session on social media yesterday morning. Structured as a role play involving a fictional social media site - Grab-U - and two outside counsel, the session took attendees through problems such sites have with defamatory posts, IP infringement and inappropriate content.

"Someone's posted a message saying 'Grab-U stinks. Your site is a blanket-blank rip-off and encourages scams. You should be sued'," said Timothy J. Lockhart of Wilcox & Savage, playing the role of Grab-U's in-house counsel."It's bad enough that it's happened, but even worse it was posted by my mom!"

"Well, I can't do anything about your issues with your mom," said Jeremy Roe of Anheuser-Busch, playing one of the outside counsel. "But I would suggest that you deal with this issue sensitively. Taking down content that defames third parties is one thing, but removing posts about your company could start a flame war."

Roe went on to explain that a flame war is caused when companies take a heavy-handed approach with Internet users, which leads to a reaction across social media and a lot of bad publicity. One Canadian beer company, which went unnamed, experienced just such a reaction when it tried to stop images being used of a suspected murderer holding one of its beer bottles. It prompted a storm of comment online, including creative ways of associating the brand more closely with the man in question.

"Wasn't there an Australian sandwich maker that used humor to good effect in such as case?" asked Lockhart. "Yes, they were reacting to an accusation that their foot-long sandwiches were not a foot long, and the funny way they dealt with it actually led to a lot of positive coverage," said Roe.

The discussion was full of jokes and jibes between the three attorneys, with frequent references to the superiority of Budweiser beer and the outside counsel - Roe and Janice Housey of Symbus Law Group - professing to have never heard of the term "non-billable."

The last problem to be discussed was typical: a user of Grab-U had posted pictures of a colleague at an INTA Annual Meeting being "over served." The slide included a picture of a cartoon character drinking a big glass of beer. "Have you ever heard of this organization, INTA?" asked Lockhart. "Yes, although from what I understand it is a reputable organization. This incident must have been an exception," said Roe.

For all the humor ("the DMCA - isn't that a rap group?"), there were serious and practical points for brand owners throughout the session. Housey explained certain provisions of a suggested terms-of-use policy that was available for attendees, and advised that these should include points on everything from trademarks to defamatory content, illegal actions to rights of privacy.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Attorneys explain why there are early signs that the US Supreme Court could rule in favour of ISP Cox in a copyright dispute
A swathe of UPC-related hires suggests firms are taking the forum seriously, as questions over the transitional stage begin
A win for Nintendo in China and King & Spalding hiring a prominent patent litigator were also among the top talking points
Rebecca Newman at Addleshaw Goddard, who live-reported on the seminal dispute, unpicks the trials and tribulations of the case and considers its impact
Attorneys predict how Lululemon’s trade dress and design patent suit against Costco could play out
Lawyers at Linklaters analyse some of the key UPC trends so far, and look ahead to life beyond the transition period
David Rodrigues, who previously worked at an IP boutique, said he may become more involved in transactional work at his new firm
Indian smartphone maker Lava must pay $2.3 million as a security deposit for past sales, as its dispute with Dolby over audio coding SEPs plays out
Powell Gilbert’s opening in Düsseldorf, complete with a new partner hire, continues this summer’s trend of UPC-related lateral movement
IP leaders at Brandsmiths and Bird & Bird, who were on opposing sides at the UK Supreme Court in Iconix v Dream Pairs, unpick the landmark case and its ramifications
Gift this article