Canada proposes new trade mark legislation

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Canada proposes new trade mark legislation

Christian Paradis

Canada’s Minister of Industry, Christian Paradis, has introduced legislation that would crack down on counterfeits, redefine the term trade mark and allow for so-called divisional trade mark applications, among other changes

Christian Paradis

Bill C-56 had its first reading in the House of Commons on Friday. Among the most significant changes it proposes is a new definition of a trade mark that would recognise non-traditional marks, including colour, smell, taste and texture marks, as well as confirm the registrability of sound and hologram marks, according to Smart & Biggar/Fetherstonhaugh.

Specifically, the legislation defines the word trade mark as "a sign or combination of signs that is used by a person for the purpose of distinguishing or so as to distinguish their goods or services from those of others". It is this introduction of a so-called sign concept that would allow for the registration of non-traditional marks.

The present language of the Trade-Marks Act defines a trade mark as "a mark that is used by a person for the purpose of distinguishing or so as to distinguish wares or services manufactured, sold, leased, hired or performed by him from those manufactured, sold, leased, hired or performed by others".

"The totality of changes is clearly meant to create flexibility and allow for the registration of all types of non-traditional marks but only if they are, in fact, distinctive," wrote Kelly Gill of Gowlings.

The bill would also improve border measures by granting Customs officials authority to seize and detain goods and establishing criminal provisions for infringement, with fines of up to $1 million, imprisonment up to five years, or both.

Additionally, the bill would allow for filing of certification marks based on proposed use, rather than having to wait until the mark is already in use, as applicants do now.

Divisional trade mark applications would also be permitted, allowing applicants to register for goods and services already in use without having to abandon the application for the remaining goods and services.

The bill is expected to move quickly to a second reading and then be referred to a committee where witnesses may be called to comment and amendments will be considered.

"Since the Bill was introduced by the Government, which has a majority in both Parliament and the Senate, it is expected that the Bill will pass during the current session of Parliament," said Smart & Biggar's release.

The Bill must then undergo a similar process in the Senate before receiving Royal Assent and implementation.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Earlier this month, Managing IP had exclusively reported that the French arm of Taylor Wessing was minded to pull out of the deal
Our latest podcast examines how Weil’s IP practice evolved, where its practitioners could (and will) go next, and which firms and markets stand to benefit from the redistribution of talent
Former Latham partner Chris Henry and transactions lawyer Liza Cotter are heading to the firm as Weil’s IP practice starts to disperse
Rival IP teams return to court for a closely watched appeal over AI and copyright, but observers hoping for answers to some of the technology’s biggest legal questions may be left disappointed
Eight years after its launch, members of the Australian patent firm’s Singapore office explain its growth strategy over the past year
Lawyers at Bowmans Kenya discuss the digital blind spots posed by the transition from physical ledgers to cloud databases and digital co-development models
The Powell Gilbert co-founder discusses the confidence required to launch a firm, building an enduring patent litigation practice and why developing the next generation has changed her measure of success
Cabinet M Oproiu’s Raluca Vasilescu explains why AI is changing what clients expect from patent attorneys, where the technology is overhyped and what the next generation will need to do differently
As clients demand more flexible fees and AI-driven efficiencies, IP firms are rethinking pricing without abandoning the value of their work
HG Law was formed largely by ex Fish & Neave lawyers who left after the latter's merger with Ropes & Gray; now those experiences are shaping its latest combination
Gift this article