Canada proposes new trade mark legislation

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Canada proposes new trade mark legislation

Christian Paradis

Canada’s Minister of Industry, Christian Paradis, has introduced legislation that would crack down on counterfeits, redefine the term trade mark and allow for so-called divisional trade mark applications, among other changes

Christian Paradis

Bill C-56 had its first reading in the House of Commons on Friday. Among the most significant changes it proposes is a new definition of a trade mark that would recognise non-traditional marks, including colour, smell, taste and texture marks, as well as confirm the registrability of sound and hologram marks, according to Smart & Biggar/Fetherstonhaugh.

Specifically, the legislation defines the word trade mark as "a sign or combination of signs that is used by a person for the purpose of distinguishing or so as to distinguish their goods or services from those of others". It is this introduction of a so-called sign concept that would allow for the registration of non-traditional marks.

The present language of the Trade-Marks Act defines a trade mark as "a mark that is used by a person for the purpose of distinguishing or so as to distinguish wares or services manufactured, sold, leased, hired or performed by him from those manufactured, sold, leased, hired or performed by others".

"The totality of changes is clearly meant to create flexibility and allow for the registration of all types of non-traditional marks but only if they are, in fact, distinctive," wrote Kelly Gill of Gowlings.

The bill would also improve border measures by granting Customs officials authority to seize and detain goods and establishing criminal provisions for infringement, with fines of up to $1 million, imprisonment up to five years, or both.

Additionally, the bill would allow for filing of certification marks based on proposed use, rather than having to wait until the mark is already in use, as applicants do now.

Divisional trade mark applications would also be permitted, allowing applicants to register for goods and services already in use without having to abandon the application for the remaining goods and services.

The bill is expected to move quickly to a second reading and then be referred to a committee where witnesses may be called to comment and amendments will be considered.

"Since the Bill was introduced by the Government, which has a majority in both Parliament and the Senate, it is expected that the Bill will pass during the current session of Parliament," said Smart & Biggar's release.

The Bill must then undergo a similar process in the Senate before receiving Royal Assent and implementation.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Niall Trainor, managing attorney at Hasbro, says brands could boost their business with careful portfolio culling
A decision by the Paris Central Division will lead to more IP work for outside counsel, say sources
Courts are encouraged to deliver judgments within three months of a trial, but that deadline has been missed in several recent cases
Lawyers at Maiwald and Sterne Kessler analyse how patents with claims directed to medical treatments are handled in the US and in Europe
Michael DeVincenzo explains how he and his team convinced the Federal Circuit to find in favour of his client in a patent case against Salesforce
Funders and a litigator explain how litigation funding disclosure requirements could affect their business
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Discussions about whether to seek director reviews can come up frequently with clients, even though actual grant rates are rare
In the latest episode, we discuss why IP firms might be attractive to PE investors and bring you the latest news on submissions for next year’s IP STARS rankings
Back-to-back PE deals for IP firms in recent years show that IP firms are sitting on goldmines, so traditional partnerships should be open to change
Gift this article