IPCom wins access to licences in FRAND case

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

IPCom wins access to licences in FRAND case

A legal adviser to patent licensing company IPCom can inspect confidential licensing agreements signed by Nokia and HTC, a UK judge has ruled

The January 24 judgment by Mr Justice Floyd is the latest twist in extensive litigation initiated by IPCom after it bought Bosch’s telecoms patent portfolio, which includes a number of standard-essential patents.

IPCom has asserted various patents against companies including Nokia and HTC. One of those patents was found to be valid and infringed by Nokia, while a parallel case against HTC concerning the same patent is pending.

Other IPCom patents have been found to be invalid or not infringed .

The latest hearings concern the determination of the appropriate royalty to be paid by Nokia and HTC under FRAND terms.

IPCom sought permission to view relevant confidential licences signed by Nokia and HTC with third parties, and specified five Nokia and three HTC agreements.

These would be made available to a “confidentiality club” comprising (1) legal advisers and counsel, (2) named experts and (3) two other named individuals. Nokia and HTC objected to the inclusion of the third category, and also to the specific people that IPCom proposed.

In his judgment, Floyd said that two men, Bernhard Frohwitter and Christoph Schoeller (who run IPCom ), should not be allowed access but that a third, Roman Sedlmaier, should be allowed to join the club.

Sedlmaier is a partner of German law firm Frohwitter , and has represented IPCom since 2007. He has given an undertaking to withhold confidential information from those not in the club.

“Dr Sedlmaier ... is an external lawyer bound by a professional code of conduct ... To the extent that he is involved in future negotiations he will have to shut out from his mind anything learned from the confidential documents,” wrote Floyd.

The trial to decide the royalty to be paid by Nokia on the patent is scheduled for July this year, and many observers of standard-essential patents expect that to be one of the first opportunities for the courts to define FRAND terms.

However, there is a hint in Floyd’s judgment that the hearing may not take place. He noted: “Shortly before the application was due to be heard, Nokia and IPCom announced that they were close to a settlement of the disputes between them.”

IPCom is represented by barristers James Flynn QC, Iain Purvis QC and Kassie Smith and law firm Bristows.

Nokia is represented by barrister James Abrahams and law firm Bird & Bird while HTC is represented by Adrian Speck QC and Josh Holmes and SJ Berwin.

Ericsson, represented by Mark Chacksfield and Taylor Wessing, and RIM, represented by Joe Delaney and Allen & Overy, also took part in the hearing.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The UK-India trade deal doesn’t mention legal services, showing India has again failed to agree on a move that could help foreign firms and local practitioners
Eva-Maria Strobel reveals some of the firm’s IP achievements and its approach to client relationships
Lateral hires at Thompson Hine and Pierson Ferdinand said they were inspired by fresh business opportunities and innovative strategies at their new firms
The launch of a new IP insurance product and INTA hiring a former USPTO commissioner were also among the top talking points this week
The firm explains how it secured a $170.6 million verdict against the government in a patent dispute surrounding airport technology, and why the case led to interest from other inventors
Developments of note included the court partially allowing a claim concerning confidentiality clubs and a decision involving technology used in football matches
The firm said adding capability in the French capital completes its coverage of all major patent litigation jurisdictions as it strives for UPC excellence
Marc Fenster explains how keeping the jury focused on the most relevant facts helped secure a $279m win for his client against Samsung
Clients are divided on what externally funded IP firms bring to the table, so those firms must prove why the benefits outweigh the downsides
Rahul Bhartiya, AI coordinator at the EUIPO, discusses the office’s strategy, collaboration with other IP offices, and getting rid of routine tasks
Gift this article