EU Court says yes to Anheuser-Busch’s Bud CTM
Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX
Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

EU Court says yes to Anheuser-Busch’s Bud CTM

Businesses that want to oppose Community trade marks have been given more guidance from the CJEU’s General Court as to how it will apply the rules on the use of a sign “in the course of trade of more than mere local significance”

In the latest round of a long-running legal battle between rival brewers Anheuser-Busch and Budějovický Budvar,the Court ruled yesterday that the Czech company could not prevent the registration of the Community trade mark Bud for beer.

Budějovický Budvar had opposed Anheuser-Busch’s application to OHIM, citing the existence of the appellation of origin “bud”, as protected in France, Italy and Portugal under the Lisbon Agreement and in Austria under bilateral deals between Austria and the former Czechoslovak Socialist Republic.

OHIM dismissed Budějovický Budvar’s oppositions on the grounds that its evidence of the use of the appellation of origin “bud” in Austria, France, Italy and Portugal was insufficient.

OHIM’s decision was ultimately appealed to the Court of Justice, which held that a geographical indication protected in a member state can only prevent the registration of a CTM if it was actually used in a sufficiently significant manner in the course of trade in a substantial part of the territory of that state.

The General Court was asked to consider whether that criterion had been met in this case.

On January 22 the Court ruled that it had not.

In particular, it said that the Czech company had not shown OHIM evidence of the use of the term bud in the course of trade of more than mere local significance before the US company filed its CTM application in July 1996.

Budějovický Budvar produced invoices showing deliveries using the term bud to just three towns in France. As such, the Court said it had not satisfied the “more than mere local significance” test. Its sales of beer using the bud name were similarly low in Austria.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The group of lawyers, which includes seven IP partners, say they were impressed by ArentFox Schiff's wide-reaching experience
Andy Sherman, general counsel at Dolby Laboratories, says the company will continue to make GE Licensing’s patents available through existing pools
CMS, which represents Nestlé, had been told to respond to a cancellation action by February 12 but filed its response a day later
Keith Bergelt, CEO of the Open Invention Network, explains why AI technologies were not part of an update to its cross-licensing project
Kirkland & Ellis partners explain how they secured the dismissal of a patent case in which the other side had lied under oath
Managing IP understands the association had been considering other options, including Madrid or Vienna, after concerns were raised over Dubai’s positions on various rights
Chris Marando tells Managing IP that he's excited to work on PTAB matters at Perkins Coie, which recently hired another lawyer from his former firm
To mark Pride month, Darren Smyth, cochair of IP Out, says the legal profession must not forget that some members still face exclusion and hostility
Lawyers say the opening of the Milan central division this month is likely to boost the so far 'modest' activity in Italy
Sharon Urias tells us why she still has to explain the difference between copyright and trademarks
Gift this article