Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Three new gTLD objections rejected

WIPO has published the first three decisions on legal rights objections to new gTLDs, and in each case the objection has been rejected

The strings concerned were .vip, .express and .home.

Legal rights objections can be brought based on IP rights where a complainant believes that an applied-for gTLD takes unfair advantage of the distinctive character or reputation of its trade mark, unjustifiably impairs its reputation or otherwise creates a likelihood of confusion.

In the .vip case, German company I-REGISTRY has a pending German application for VIP and its parent company owns a CTM for VIP. But the gTLD applicant, Vipspace Enterprises of Texas, USA and Munich, Germany owns a CTM for DOTVIP.

Panellist Tony Willoughby said he was satisfied that the applicant intended to use the gTLD “first and foremost as a descriptive term describing the purpose and characteristics of the domain (i.e. a domain for Very Important Persons)” and that therefore confusion was unlikely.

The .express dispute pitted a clothing store called Express against Sea Sunset, a subsidiary of Donuts (which has applied for more than 300 new gTLDs). Panellist Frederick M Abbott found that there were “so many common usages of the term ‘express’ that it is not reasonable to foreclose its use by Respondent as a gTLD”.

The decision is analysed by Kevin Murphy on his Domain Incite blog. He suggests it may be bad news for owners of dictionary-word brands: “The ruling could have a big impact on future rounds of the new gTLD program, possibly giving rise to an influx of defensive, generic-word dot-brand applications.”

The .home case pitted Defender Security Company, which owns a CTM word and design mark for .HOME, against Charleston Road Registry (a Google company), which had applied for the .home gTLD.

Panellist M Scott Donahey found that the objector “had not met its burden to show that it is a rightsholder for purposes of this proceeding” and that, even if it had met that burden, the objection should be rejected.

The same company has eight other complaints pending against applicants for .home.

More than 70 legal rights objections to new gTLD applications were filed. The full list is available on the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center website.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The FTC’s plans to scrutinise improperly listed Orange Book patents could make these listings more important in litigation, but firms should be looking at this anyway
Counsel at Debevoise & Plimpton explain how they helped food delivery business Grubhub avoid a preliminary injunction at the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
European lawyers tell Managing IP how the legal market is reacting to the first few months of the UPC and why cases are set to take off
The ban could be extended or cancelled, depending on whether Judge Pauline Newman cooperates with an investigation, the Judicial Council of the Federal Circuit stated
Sources say some China-based lawyers are prepared to take large pay cuts to join stable practices, but most firms are sceptical about new hires
Lord Justice Colin Birss used ChatGPT to help him write a judgment, a development that has generated plenty of debate but which is perhaps inevitable
The decision marks the first time the Unified Patent Court has issued a preliminary injunction after an oral hearing involving both sides in a dispute
The German carmaker is the second licensee to sign up to Avanci’s 5G pool following its launch last month
Managing IP presents the third edition of its Ones to Watch list, profiling 22 in-house counsel on the rise
Marko Stübegger is a legal IP management expert at RHI Magnesita in Austria