FTC announces investigation into patent trolls in the US
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

FTC announces investigation into patent trolls in the US


Federal Trade Commission chairwoman Edith Ramirez announced that the FTC is launching an investigation into the potentially anti-competitive practices of patent trolls in the US

Ramirez made the announcement during a seminar on patent trolls and anti-competition law hosted in Washington DC by the Computer & Communications Industry Association and American Antitrust Institute.

The investigation is part of a coordinated crackdown on patent trolls by the Obama administration. It follows the announcement earlier this month of a White House plan to curb patent trolls, which will mainly be implemented through the USPTO. The plan was accompanied by a 17-page study by the National Economic Council and the Council of Economic Advisors and has been generally well-received by academics, industry and consumer advocate organisations.

Ramirez said the investigation will be held under Section 6b of the Federal Trade Commission Act, to “help develop a better understanding” of what she referred to as patent assertion entities (PAEs), which are popularly known as patent trolls.

She said that while the Commission still has “only snapshots of the cost of PAE activity”, early indications suggest that their benefits to innovation and the general public are greatly outweighed by their costs, which include shifting money away from research and development.

Between 2007 and 2012, the number of patent infringement lawsuits filed by trolls tripled, said Ramirez. Trolls now file the majority of patent infringement lawsuits in the US.

She said that PAE activity is also “changing shape”. Although IT is still the industry most targeted by trolls, data and anecdotal evidence collected by the FTC suggests that they now file half of all their lawsuits outside of the high tech sector.

Retailers are now the most common low tech sector targeted by trolls, and the FTC has had complaints from online retailers who have had to defend lawsuits against common features on their websites such as drop-down menus and shopping carts.

Small businesses have also increasingly become targets, with offline businesses such as coffee shops being sued for patent infringement for offering features like WiFi. Ramirez said the FTC plans to use Section 5 authority to protect small businesses against deceptive patent claims by trolls, such as attempting to secure settlements relating to expired patents or patents the troll has no rights to.

She said the Commission is also concerned about an increase in what she described as “hybrid PAE activity”, in which large corporations hide behind shell companies to engage in troll activities strategically targeting competitors.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

A senior USPTO attorney spoke at a Nokia-sponsored event on the EU’s proposed SEP Regulation today, November 29
IP counsel are ‘flooded’ with queries from clients worried about deepfakes, but the law has so far come up short
Each week Managing IP speaks to a different IP practitioner about their life and career
Mathys & Squire has filed a test case that the firm hopes will make UPC pleadings available by default
Multiple representatives and their teams can now work on cases using the online CMS, but not everyone can submit documents
James Lawrence, partner at Addisons, explains how he convinced the full Federal Court of Australia to back his client in a patent dispute concerning mining safety equipment
The deal will allow the companies to use each other’s patents covering 4G and 5G technologies, and other cellular SEPs
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis coverage from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Three lead IP counsel in the US, the UK and China share how they walk the fine line between building in-house competence and splurging on external lawyers
Mike Renaud, head of the IP division at Mintz, explains his business strategy and how the firm justifies charging higher rates