Federal circuit reconsiders claim construction standards in Lighting Ballast v Philips

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Federal circuit reconsiders claim construction standards in Lighting Ballast v Philips

The Federal Circuit heard oral arguments on Friday in Lighting Ballast Control v Philips Electronics, a patent case that is challenging the court’s standard for claim construction

During the en banc rehearing, both parties argued that the court should revise its de novo standard of review in claim construction cases. But while Lighting Ballast wants the Federal Circuit to drop the de novo standard altogether and defer to a district court’s interpretation of the claim, appellee Universal Lighting Technologies argued that the Federal Circuit should only defer to the district court’s interpretation when considering disputed issues of historical fact.

The case involves Lighting Ballast’s patents for control and protection circuits for electronic lighting ballasts commonly used in fluorescent lighting. A jury at the District Court for the Northern District of Texas found that Universal Lighting Technologies had infringed the patents.

In January, the Federal Circuit reversed the jury decision, concluding that claim construction is a matter of law rather than fact and can therefore be decided without deference to the district court’s interpretation.

The case will also have implications for the USPTO’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board and Inter Partes Review and Post Grant Review proceedings, which at present apply the “broadest reasonable interpretation” standard under the America Invents Act. District courts use a higher claim construction standard.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

A $110 million US verdict against Apple and an appellate order staying a $39 million trademark infringement finding against Amazon were also among the top talking points
Attorneys are watching how AI affects trademark registrations and whether a SCOTUS ruling from last year will have broader free speech implications
Patent lawyers explain why they will be keeping an eye on the implications of a pharma case and on changes at the USPTO in the second half of 2025
The insensitive reaction to a UK politician crying on TV proves we have a long way to go before we can say we are tackling workplace wellbeing
Adrian Percer says he was impressed by the firm’s work on billion-dollar cases as well as its culture
In our latest interview with women IP leaders, Catherine Bonner at Murgitroyd discusses technology, training, and teaching
Developments included an update in the VAR dispute between Ballinno and UEFA, the latest CMS updates, and a swathe of market moves
The LMG Life Sciences Americas Awards is thrilled to present the 2025 shortlist
A new order has brought the total security awarded to a Canadian tech company to $45 million, the highest-ever by an Indian court in an IP case
Andrew Blattman reflects on how IP practices have changed and shares his hopes for increased AI use and better performance on the stock market
Gift this article