Junior CTM registration no defence, Court rules

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Junior CTM registration no defence, Court rules

Owners of registered Community trade marks cannot use their marks to defend infringement actions based on a senior CTM, Europe’s highest court has ruled

FCI mark

The Court of Justice of the EU ruled yesterday in a case between two dog breeding organizations, FCI and FCIPPR. Both owned similar Community trade marks. A court in Alicante asked the Court of Justice to decide whether Article 9(1) of the Trade Mark Regulation allows CTM owners to prevent other parties from using similar or identical sign, even if that later-registered mark has not been declared invalid.

The Court said that the owner of the more recent registration cannot use that registration to defend itself against claims of infringement by the owner of a senior mark.

FCIPPR-mark

The decision has important implications for the law in a number of member states, such as the UK, Spain and Ireland, which allow defendants in infringement actions to rely on their junior registrations until they have been declared invalid.

The ruling implies that such a defence should not be allowed.

The Fédération Cynologique Internationale was represented by Eric Jordi Cubells of Monereo Meyer Marinel-lo. The Federación Canina Internacional de Perros de Pura Raza was advised by S Doménech López.




more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Cabinet M Oproiu’s Raluca Vasilescu explains why AI is changing what clients expect from patent attorneys, where the technology is overhyped and what the next generation will need to do differently
As clients demand more flexible fees and AI-driven efficiencies, IP firms are rethinking pricing without abandoning the value of their work
HG Law was formed largely by ex Fish & Neave lawyers who left after the latter's merger with Ropes & Gray; now those experiences are shaping its latest combination
David Rodrigues and Evan Lazerowitz – attorneys at Robinson & Cole – offer practical guidance on the steps a business might consider to preserve and maximise IP value before entering financial distress or insolvency
Daniel Law CEO Alicia Daniel-Shores may have stepped into a family business, but she has spent two decades building her own vision around technology and litigation
Law firms don't particularly like saying no to clients. Perhaps they should get better at it
The office, which has a relatively new patent litigation team as well as a wider ‘soft’ IP offering, would remain independent if the rejection is rubberstamped
The IP boutique is betting that growing investment in quantum and semiconductors will fuel demand as technology shifts toward physical systems
Lawyers say the overhaul better reflects commercial reality, with changes spanning novelty searches, digital designs and access to a small claims track, but stopping short of criminalising unregistered design infringement
Carpmaels & Ransford hires its fourth partner of the year and wins access to UPC files, as fresh orders address costs, confidentiality and the use of divisional patents
Gift this article