MoFo soars in US patent survey

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

MoFo soars in US patent survey

survey2013-45.png

Blockbuster cases in the US as well as major shake ups in Latin America mean significant changes in the Americas rankings in this year’s Managing IP patents survey

In the US, Morrison & Foerster’s phenomenal win for Apple against Samsung, coupled with unanimous praise from the market, has sent it soaring to tier 1 for national patent contentious work. The firm won a $1 billion jury verdict for Apple in the Northern District of California last August, which was upheld by Judge Lucy Koh just last week.

MIP survey 2013

The US ITC rankings have seen some movement as well, with both Covington & Burling and Quinn Emanuel & Urquhart moving up to tier 1. Meanwhile, some of the more traditional ITC stars, such as Adduci Mastriani & Schaumberg and Foster Murphy Altman & Nickel, moved down a notch. This is perhaps a testament to the increasingly important role the ITC is playing in the US market, which is forcing bigger firms to sharpen their skills there.

In Brazil, the big news this year was the dissolution of Momsen Leonardos, which has been a strong presence in the country since 1919. A disagreement among the firm’s leadership resulted in a split, and two new firms have emerged: Kasznar Leonardos and Luiz Leonardos. Most agree that Kasznar is the stronger of the two, with a higher percentage of the original firm members having chosen to stay on - but only time will tell how the two firms will fare separately.

Another significant change comes in Mexico, where one of the country’s two traditional IP powerhouses – Uhthoff Gomez Vega & Uhthoff – has been bumped down one tier for patent contentious work. While Uhthoff remains highly recommended by peers for prosecution work and won Managing IP’s award for best patent firm last year, this year there was a clear indication that their litigation presence has been falling off.

This year’s survey also benefits from more in-depth research in the US market, particularly with respect to individual attorneys. The upcoming IP Stars handbook will rank leading firms and lawyers in each US state, and has led to several new additions to our national rankings as well. These include: K&L Gates for ITC work; Harness Dickey & Pierce, Schwegman Lundberg & Woessner, Novak Druce & Quigg and Faegre Baker Daniels in patent prosecution; and nine new firms in patent contentious, including Desmarais and Niro Haller & Niro.

Because IP Stars will provide a more comprehensive overview of regional firms and attorneys than Managing IP’s regional rankings, these have been eliminated, and highlights of the IP Stars state rankings will be published in the April issue of Managing IP.

The full Americas patent rankings, which cover 13 jurisdictions, are available here to subscribers. Readers can take a free trial to gain full access for a limited time.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

James Davies and Vishen Pillay at Adams & Adams discuss IP protection strategies and ownership considerations for AI
HGF CEO Martyn Fish tells Managing IP in an exclusive interview what private equity firm CBPE’s minority investment in the firm means for the business and its people
In-house counsel and teams can now submit information for the 20th annual Managing IP Awards programme
Ahsan Shaikh at McDermott reveals how the firm is using three AI tools, including one for drafting patent applications
As K&S Partners celebrates its 30th anniversary, founder Jyoti Sagar looks back at the firm’s journey and explains why corporate and IP practices should be kept separate
Counsel reveal the lessons learned from a rejected amicus brief concerning Monster Energy that alleged ‘trademark bullying’
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
New guidelines from Canada's IP office will outline how specific IP owners must be when listing goods and services in applications
Panasonic aimed to coerce Xiaomi into accepting terms the court would not determine to be FRAND, according to two judges
A case heading to the England and Wales Court of Appeal raises interesting questions about the nature of the average consumer in trademark law
Gift this article