Indian Supreme Court postpones hearing in FT trade mark dispute
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Indian Supreme Court postpones hearing in FT trade mark dispute

The Supreme Court has stayed proceedings before the Karnataka High Court in the 20-year old fight over the Financial Times trade mark.

The Indian Express reports that the Supreme Court has responded to a stay petition by the British publisher of the Financial Times newspaper (FTUK), and instructed Times Publishing House (TPH), the Indian publishing conglomerate behind the Times of India and the Economic Times, to respond in two weeks.

The stay is the latest development in the two-decade long fight over the Financial Times mark. The dispute started in December 1993 when TPH filed to rectify FTUK’s mark. TPH also received a registration for the mark in 2005, resulting in two Financial Times marks in the register.

The most recent development in this matter came last June, when the IPAB cancelled both FTUK and TPH’s marks. The IPAB cancelled TPH’s mark finding that it had registered them dishonestly. The IPAB cancelled the FTUK mark on the grounds that its trade mark application claimed continuous use since 1948, but there was only evidence of use since 1951.

Anuradha Salhotra at Lall Lahiri & Salhotra found the IPAB’s grounds to cancel FTUK’s mark surprising, especially since it also found that the mark had established a “formidable” and “enviable” trans-border reputation.

Remfry & Sagar acted as counsel for FTUK, while Inttl Advocare represented TPH.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

A team of lawyers who joined Norton Rose Fulbright from Polsinelli say they were drawn to the firm's global platform
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Lawyers say a ruling concerning liability for trademark infringement could give company directors an easy way out and create litigation uncertainty
The LMG Life Sciences Awards announces the winners for the 5th annual awards
Some US lawyers have strengthened their connections with European firms as they help clients determine whether the UPC will become a 'centre of gravity'
In the latest episode, the team discusses the battle to take control of listed company and IP business Qantm IP, and looks at some recent hiring trends
To mark Mental Health Awareness Week, lawyers explain how they manage their mental health, and how they pluck up the courage to ask themselves difficult questions
IP lawyers unpick a case heard at the CJEU’s Grand Chamber this week that could potentially create a new world for litigation in Europe
A lawyer who replied to a cease-and-desist letter with just two words has shown others how to deal with vexatious infringement allegations
The suggested rule change surrounding terminal disclaimers could ease the burden on defendants, but risks complicating prosecution strategies
Gift this article