US court: Amazon's alternative search results do not infringe

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

US court: Amazon's alternative search results do not infringe

Online businesses can suggest alternative products without committing trade mark infringement when customers search for a specific brand, a US court has ruled

In Multi Time Machine v Amazon, online retailer Amazon was sued by watch manufacturer Multi Time Machine (MTM), which sells military style watches under the brand names MTM Special Ops and MTM Military Ops.

When customers searched for MTM Special Ops on Amazon, they got no results because MTM does not allow resales of its products on Amazon. Amazon therefore offered a selection of alternative watches from competitors instead – some of them including the word “ops”.

The District Court for the Central District of California ruled last week that there was no likelihood of confusion because although a substitution occurred, Amazon made it clear that the alternatives were not made by MTM.

The case, which may have ramifications for many online businesses, bears similarities to disputes around the world over Google AdWords, although limited to Amazon’s internal search engine.

MTM has said that it plans to appeal against the decision.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Attorneys explain why there are early signs that the US Supreme Court could rule in favour of ISP Cox in a copyright dispute
A swathe of UPC-related hires suggests firms are taking the forum seriously, as questions over the transitional stage begin
A win for Nintendo in China and King & Spalding hiring a prominent patent litigator were also among the top talking points
Rebecca Newman at Addleshaw Goddard, who live-reported on the seminal dispute, unpicks the trials and tribulations of the case and considers its impact
Attorneys predict how Lululemon’s trade dress and design patent suit against Costco could play out
Lawyers at Linklaters analyse some of the key UPC trends so far, and look ahead to life beyond the transition period
David Rodrigues, who previously worked at an IP boutique, said he may become more involved in transactional work at his new firm
Indian smartphone maker Lava must pay $2.3 million as a security deposit for past sales, as its dispute with Dolby over audio coding SEPs plays out
Powell Gilbert’s opening in Düsseldorf, complete with a new partner hire, continues this summer’s trend of UPC-related lateral movement
IP leaders at Brandsmiths and Bird & Bird, who were on opposing sides at the UK Supreme Court in Iconix v Dream Pairs, unpick the landmark case and its ramifications
Gift this article