US court: Amazon's alternative search results do not infringe

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

US court: Amazon's alternative search results do not infringe

Online businesses can suggest alternative products without committing trade mark infringement when customers search for a specific brand, a US court has ruled

In Multi Time Machine v Amazon, online retailer Amazon was sued by watch manufacturer Multi Time Machine (MTM), which sells military style watches under the brand names MTM Special Ops and MTM Military Ops.

When customers searched for MTM Special Ops on Amazon, they got no results because MTM does not allow resales of its products on Amazon. Amazon therefore offered a selection of alternative watches from competitors instead – some of them including the word “ops”.

The District Court for the Central District of California ruled last week that there was no likelihood of confusion because although a substitution occurred, Amazon made it clear that the alternatives were not made by MTM.

The case, which may have ramifications for many online businesses, bears similarities to disputes around the world over Google AdWords, although limited to Amazon’s internal search engine.

MTM has said that it plans to appeal against the decision.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

On a recent trip to the French capital, we learned that the UPC is squeezing domestic litigation while firms are chasing senior talent, experimenting with AI and considering new ways of organising their practices
Daniel Law says a string of lateral hires and broader expansion plans will strengthen its position to capitalise on Brazil’s burgeoning IP and patent litigation market
Jason Raeburn’s arrival will expand the firm’s London footprint in AI, copyright and tech disputes
The firm is shaping its AI strategy around partnerships with Harvey and Legora alongside internally developed tools from its legal technology company, Eltemate
A dispute Down Under shows why trademark lawyers cannot afford to wait on the sidelines when a rival brand gathers momentum
The Third Circuit’s decision in Thomson Reuters v ROSS marks the first appellate-level decision addressing AI and fair use, prompting copyright counsel to consider arguments around potential licensing markets
Injunctions for HandsFree Labs and Align Technology come as the Court of Appeal warns that busy teams must have the staffing and resources to meet UPC deadlines
The chief technology officer remit, which has been created as the firm is building its litigation team, will include expanding the use of AI in patent and legal work and automating manual processes
Former Hoyng Rokh Moneiger partner Laura Alonso, who brought her team to ECIJA in March, discusses plans to expand further and why ECIJA’s ‘IP DNA’ is helping broaden her work
Amita Haylock discusses building an integrated Asia practice as clients increasingly demand that firms combine IP, technology and data expertise
Gift this article