US court: Amazon's alternative search results do not infringe

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

US court: Amazon's alternative search results do not infringe

Online businesses can suggest alternative products without committing trade mark infringement when customers search for a specific brand, a US court has ruled

In Multi Time Machine v Amazon, online retailer Amazon was sued by watch manufacturer Multi Time Machine (MTM), which sells military style watches under the brand names MTM Special Ops and MTM Military Ops.

When customers searched for MTM Special Ops on Amazon, they got no results because MTM does not allow resales of its products on Amazon. Amazon therefore offered a selection of alternative watches from competitors instead – some of them including the word “ops”.

The District Court for the Central District of California ruled last week that there was no likelihood of confusion because although a substitution occurred, Amazon made it clear that the alternatives were not made by MTM.

The case, which may have ramifications for many online businesses, bears similarities to disputes around the world over Google AdWords, although limited to Amazon’s internal search engine.

MTM has said that it plans to appeal against the decision.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Cabinet M Oproiu’s Raluca Vasilescu explains why AI is changing what clients expect from patent attorneys, where the technology is overhyped and what the next generation will need to do differently
As clients demand more flexible fees and AI-driven efficiencies, IP firms are rethinking pricing without abandoning the value of their work
HG Law was formed largely by ex Fish & Neave lawyers who left after the latter's merger with Ropes & Gray; now those experiences are shaping its latest combination
David Rodrigues and Evan Lazerowitz – attorneys at Robinson & Cole – offer practical guidance on the steps a business might consider to preserve and maximise IP value before entering financial distress or insolvency
Daniel Law CEO Alicia Daniel-Shores may have stepped into a family business, but she has spent two decades building her own vision around technology and litigation
Law firms don't particularly like saying no to clients. Perhaps they should get better at it
The office, which has a relatively new patent litigation team as well as a wider ‘soft’ IP offering, would remain independent if the rejection is rubberstamped
The IP boutique is betting that growing investment in quantum and semiconductors will fuel demand as technology shifts toward physical systems
Lawyers say the overhaul better reflects commercial reality, with changes spanning novelty searches, digital designs and access to a small claims track, but stopping short of criminalising unregistered design infringement
Carpmaels & Ransford hires its fourth partner of the year and wins access to UPC files, as fresh orders address costs, confidentiality and the use of divisional patents
Gift this article