Europeans’ IP habits laid bare
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Europeans’ IP habits laid bare

Nine out of 10 Europeans have not bought counterfeit products or downloaded illegally in the past 12 months, according to a report on perceptions of IP published by OHIM this week

The report was based on research among people in the 28 EU member states. Among its findings were:

  • 9% of citizens have accessed/downloaded or streamed illegal content from the internet intentionally in the past 12 months

  • 4% have purchased counterfeit goods intentionally, while 6% have purchased counterfeit goods as a result of being misled

  • 34% say that buying counterfeit goods allows making a smart purchase, while 38% say it is an act of protest against large premium brands

  • 22% consider it acceptable to download illegal content when there is no legal alternative, and 42% consider it is acceptable when it is for personal use

  • 96% say it is important that inventors, performers and creative artists can protect their rights and be paid for their work; 86% agree protecting IP is important for improving and guaranteeing the quality of products and services

  • 81% agree with the statement “buying counterfeit products ruins businesses and jobs”

  • 84% disagree with the statement “it is acceptable to buy counterfeit products when it concerns luxury products” while 75% disagree with “it is acceptable to buy counterfeit products when the price for the original is too high”

  • 73% state that they have a good understanding of “intellectual property” but only 13% demonstrate a good knowledge

The report concluded that “IP and its main related terms are more heard than really understood in detail by Europeans”.

The research was carried out by Edelman Berland from December 2012 to August 2013. It comprised a literature review, qualitative investigation and quantitative stage.

The research covered all 28 EU member states, while in-depth interviews and focus groups were held in nine representative member states. In total, over 26,500 Europeans expressed their views through a telephone questionnaire.

The report also examines activity by demographic. For example, 26% of 15 to 24 year olds had downloaded or accessed copyright-protected content illegally in the past 12 months, while men were twice as likely to download illegally as women.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Mary Till, a former legal advisor at the USPTO who has joined Finnegan this week, is looking forward to providing clients with a USPTO perspective
IP in-house counsel who receive lots of pitches from AI vendors explain how they review them – or why they ignore them
Anna Sosis discusses the importance of IP education and explains why, away from IP, she could see herself becoming a mindfulness teacher
Cross-border judicial collaboration and EU copyright were hot topics on the second day of the EUIPO’s 5th IP Case Law Conference
Nancy Linck, who is 82, explains why she found something new to excite her at Carmichael IP
On day one of the EUIPO’s Case Law Conference, delegates heard why single-letter trademarks are weak and received an update on the EU’s design law shakeup
High-earning businesses place most value on the depth of the external legal teams advising them, according to a survey of nearly 29,000 in-house counsel
Kilpatrick Townsend was recognised as Americas firm of the year, while patent powerhouse James Haley won a lifetime achievement award
Partners at Foley Hoag and Kilburn & Strode explore how US and UK courts have addressed questions of AI and inventorship
In-house lawyers have considerable influence over law firms’ actions, so they must use that power to push their external advisers to adopt sustainable practices
Gift this article