Twitter accused of infringing IBM patents days before IPO

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Twitter accused of infringing IBM patents days before IPO

Twitter has received a letter from IBM accusing it of infringing at least three IBM patents just days before the social networking site's Initial Public Offering

The allegation was revealed by Twitter in an S-1 filing used by companies to register their assets with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). In the letter sent by IBM, the technology company invited Twitter's executives "to negotiate a business resolution of the allegations".

The patents in question are US Patent No 6,957,224, which covers the efficient retrieval of uniform resource locators; No 7,072,849, which protects a method for presenting advertising in an interactive service; and No 7,099,862, which relates to programmatic discovery of common contacts.

In filing, Twitter admits that its IP portfolio is smaller than that of many of its competitors, and notes that NPEs "often attempt to aggressively assert claims in order to extract value from technology companies".

But the company says of the IBM letter: "We believe we have meritorious defenses to IBM's allegations, although there can be no assurance that we will be successful in defending against these allegations or reaching a business resolution that is satisfactory to us".

Despite the accusation, Twitter said in the SEC filing that it plans to offer its stock for between $23 and $25 a share - up from the previous asking price of between $17 and $20. The increase values the company at $17 billion, compared to the previous valuation of $11 billion.



more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

AI, cybersecurity and data practice group will provide clients with legal guidance around AI alongside a 'deep technical foundation’ in IP
Lawyers at Vondst and Biopatents say a ruling concerning the protected status of trade secrets could see the UPC flooded with requests to prevent access to confidential information
Sharad Vadehra of Kan & Krishme discusses why older IP firms still have an edge over up-and-coming boutiques and how the firm is using AI to provide quick and cost-effective service
Lawyers at Appleyard Lees share how they picked apart a plant breeder’s infringement claims concerning the ‘Tango’ mandarin
A further decision on long-arm status, and a new hire for Pentarc in Germany from Taylor Wessing were also among top developments
The US decision marks a rare grant of a request under the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act in a patent case
Stobbs has applied to strike out a contempt of court application filed against the firm and two of its lawyers
With trademark volumes surging, trademark teams need to think beyond traditional clearance searches, towards a continuous, intelligence-led workflow, says Meghan Medeiros of Corsearch
Brazilian in-house counsel say law firms’ technology investments have not translated into tangible benefits, meaning tech use is a minor factor when selecting advisers
A lack of comfort among some salaried partners shows why law firms must actively foster inclusion, not merely focus on diversity mandates
Gift this article