Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Rockstar sues companies including Google for infringing Nortel patents

The Rockstar consortium, which bought the Nortel patent portfolio for $4.5 billion, has sued cell phone manufacturers as well as Google for patent infringement

Along with another company, Netstar, the consortium, which is owned by Apple, Microsoft, BlackBerry, Sony and Ericsson, filed the lawsuits at the District Court for the Eastern District of Texas on Thursday. Rockstar and Netstar are claiming Google willfully infringed the patents and are asking for a jury trial.

Google is accused of infringing seven patents relating to technology which matches internet search terms with relevant advertising.

In addition to Google, Rockstar is also suing companies including Samsung, Huawei, ZTE, LG, HTC, Pantech, and ASUSTeK in separate lawsuits.

The Nortel patents were put up for auction in July 2011 after the company went into bankruptcy proceedings. Rockstar was given clearance by the Department of Justice to buy the portfolio after agreeing to license the patents on fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory (FRAND) terms.

Google placed a starting bid of $900 million for the patents and increased its bid several times, eventually offering $4.4 billion. After losing out to Rockstar, Google purchased Motorola for $12 billion. Google agreed to license the Motorola patents on FRAND terms, but was sued by Microsoft in November last year for allegedly demanding “excessive and discriminatory” royalties.

In the case, Rockstar Consortium US and Netstar Technologies v Google, Rockstar and Netstar are represented by Susman Godfrey.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Klaus Grabinski told delegates at a UPC inauguration event that the proposed SEP regulation would limit access to justice
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis coverage from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Sukanya Sarkar shares her thoughts on this year’s annual meeting in Singapore, where debates ranged from AI opportunities to improving law firm culture
The court’s ruling is a good reminder that US parties aren’t guaranteed attorney fees just because they win, say sources
With business confidence in a shaky state, Rachel Tan and Lisa Yong of Rouse discuss how in-house IP teams can manage their trademark portfolios through uncertain times
The Court of Appeal had stern words for Med-El’s representatives after they highlighted a deputy judge’s background as a solicitor
Funders and NPEs say asserting patent portfolios can minimise risk at the USPTO’s PTAB, where procedure remains a controversial topic
The US Supreme Court’s ruling wasn’t a surprise and reflects a trend that had already been bubbling away for a while, say tech and pharma counsel
Previous attempts at major transatlantic tie-ups have failed, so lawyers will keep their eyes firmly on Allen & Overy’s grand plans
INTA CEO Etienne Sanz de Acedo shares his plans if he were to win the EUIPO leadership race and says his application does not affect his INTA role